BUFC ranks 4th and GAUG 30th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs GAUG
BUFC −0.16pt a year
0.69%0.85%
GAUG 1.1×the volume
49.5K53.1K
BUFC vs GAUG Performance
+5.7%+7.8%
- BUFC 0.69%, better
- GAUG 0.85%
- BUFC $1.1B
- GAUG $415M
- BUFC +5.7%
- GAUG +7.8%, better
- BUFC 5
- GAUG 3
- BUFC 49.5K sh
- GAUG 53.1K sh, better
- BUFC $43.25
- GAUG $42.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | GAUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | F13 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | C50Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | |
| Durability | A74Higher | A72 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and GAUG are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
GAUGC
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
GAUG The August rung of First Trust's buffer ladder: it absorbs the first 15% of an S&P 500 drop over a one-year stretch, in exchange for a ceiling on the gains, reset every August. A deeper cushion than plain index exposure, with a lid as the price.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
GAUG The fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF up to an 11.89% upside cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during the August 18, 2025–August 21, 2026 outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs GAUG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs GAUG Cost
Overpaying GAUG vs BUFC
$2,770
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
GAUG 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | GAUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,508 | $276 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $5,706 | $1,009 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $16,199 | $2,770 |
- 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
- 0.85%GAUG
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
GAUG 37th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs GAUG Dividends
- BUFC None
- GAUG None
Distribution history
BUFC vs GAUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%GAUG 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82GAUG 1.38
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%GAUG −10.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26GAUG 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.