PSMJ ranks 2nd and BUFC 4th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
BUFC vs PSMJ
PSMJ −0.20pt a year
0.69%0.49%
BUFC 7.4×the volume
49.5K6.64K
BUFC vs PSMJ Performance
+5.8%+8.2%
- BUFC 0.69%
- PSMJ 0.49%, better
- BUFC $1.11B
- PSMJ $108M
- BUFC +5.8%
- PSMJ +8.2%, better
- BUFC
- PSMJ 0.00%
- BUFC 4
- PSMJ 3
- BUFC 49.5K sh, better
- PSMJ 6.64K sh
- BUFC $43.25
- PSMJ $34.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFC | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | B63 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. BUFC and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFCB
PSMJB
In short
BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.
PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.
Stated mandate
BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.
PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFC vs PSMJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFC vs PSMJ Cost
Overpaying BUFC vs PSMJ
$3,637
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFC 0.69%
$13,429
PSMJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFC | PSMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $883 | $349 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $3,394 | $1,303 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $9,792 | $3,637 |
- 0.69%BUFC
- 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds
BUFC vs PSMJ Dividends
- BUFC
- PSMJ 0.00%
- BUFC None
- PSMJ None
Distribution history
BUFC vs PSMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFC 3.4%PSMJ 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFC 0.82PSMJ 1.47
- Worst fall
- BUFC −8.3%PSMJ −10.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFC 0.26PSMJ 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.