Skip to content

BUFC vs PSMJ

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.20pt a year

BUFC0.69%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 7.4×the volume

BUFC49.5KPSMJ6.64K

BUFC vs PSMJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.8%BUFC+8.2%PSMJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFC +5.8%. PSMJ +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
BUFC $1.11B
PSMJ $108M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.8%
PSMJ +8.2%, better
Yield (12M)
BUFC No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
BUFC 4
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh, better
PSMJ 6.64K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
PSMJ $34.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCPSMJ
Cost30% weightB57A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41C46Higher
Tradability15% weightB62HigherC50
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA74HigherB63

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and BUFC 4th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

BUFC vs PSMJ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying BUFC vs PSMJ

$3,637

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BUFC $13,429PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearBUFCPSMJOverpaying
10$1,232$883$349
20$4,697$3,394$1,303
30$13,429$9,792$3,637

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BUFC No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021

BUFC vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024PSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024PSMJ 1.47
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023PSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPOCTC

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPOCTC

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.