Skip to content

BUFC vs GNOV

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November

GNOVCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.16pt a year

BUFC0.69%GNOV0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 6.1×the volume

BUFC48.2KGNOV7.97K

BUFC vs GNOV Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+5.9%BUFC+12.3%GNOV

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. BUFC +5.9%. GNOV +12.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
GNOV 0.85%
Fund size
BUFC $1.09B
GNOV $293M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.9%
GNOV +12.3%, better
Holdings
BUFC 5
GNOV 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 48.2K sh, better
GNOV 7.97K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $42.98
GNOV $42.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. GNOV: Cost 13, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 74, Holdings 55, Durability 72.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, GNOV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCGNOV
Cost30% weightB57HigherF13
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC47B64Higher
Tradability15% weightB60A74Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB55
Durability5% weightA74HigherA72

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and GNOV are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and GNOV 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 5BPSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 20CGMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - MarchScore 44
  7. Rank 20CGNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 44
  8. Rank 24CGFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

GNOVCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

GNOV First Trust's November rung in a 12-month buffer ladder: it follows SPY's price return (dividends excluded), absorbs the first 15% of a period's losses, and caps the upside in exchange.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

GNOV The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to a predetermined upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the stated outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • GNOV The cushion is written into the fund's terms: the first 15% of SPY's price decline over the outcome period is absorbed before losses reach you.
  • The outcome period runs November to November and resets annually, so it slots in as one rung of First Trust's monthly moderate-buffer ladder (GJAN, GAPR, GJUL and the rest).
  • Reference asset is SPY itself, plain vanilla US large caps, not a bespoke options index. And it comes in a registered 1940 Act fund, not a bank-issued note.

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • GNOV At 0.85%, the fee sits above the 0.79% median for its buffer peer group and far above laddered options like BUFF at 0.10%.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full November-to-November stretch. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and headroom are left, not the stated terms.
  • It trades lightly next to the biggest buffer ETFs, which can mean wider spreads; limit orders are the standard approach.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full GNOV profile⁠

BUFC vs GNOV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs GNOV Cost

Overpaying GNOV vs BUFC

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • GNOV 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • GNOV 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GNOV $16,199BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCGNOVOverpaying
10$1,232$1,508$276
20$4,697$5,706$1,009
30$13,429$16,199$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.85%GNOV
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

GNOV 37th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs GNOV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
GNOV None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GNOVAll GNOV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs GNOV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024GNOV 5.2%since Dec 2023
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024GNOV 1.35since Dec 2023
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023GNOV −10.7%since Nov 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26GNOV 0.38

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GNOVCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GNOVCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GNOVCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - November · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.