Skip to content

BUFC vs MMAR

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (March) ETF

MMARCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

MMAR −0.20pt a year

BUFC0.69%MMAR0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 284.3×the volume

BUFC49.5KMMAR174

BUFC vs MMAR Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.2%BUFC+1.3%MMAR

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFC +1.2%. MMAR +1.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.5%2%2.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%
MMAR 0.49%, better
Fund size
BUFC $1.11B
MMAR $2M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.8%
MMAR No data
Holdings
BUFC 4
MMAR 4
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh, better
MMAR 174 sh
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
MMAR $32.91
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. MMAR: Cost 70, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 36, Holdings not scored, Durability 23.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, MMAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCMMAR
Cost30% weightB57A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41C53Higher
Tradability15% weightB62HigherD36
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA74HigherF23

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and MMAR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and MMAR 33rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 33CMJUNPacer Swan SOS Moderate (June) ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 33CMMARPacer Swan SOS Moderate (March) ETFScore 40
  8. Rank 33CMMAYPacer Swan SOS Moderate (May) ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

MMARCPacer Swan SOS Moderate (March) ETF

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

MMAR No data

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

MMAR No data

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.

MMAR No data

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.

MMAR No data

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full MMAR profile⁠

BUFC vs MMAR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs MMAR Cost

Overpaying BUFC vs MMAR

$3,637

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • MMAR 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • MMAR 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BUFC $13,429MMAR $9,792

Year by year

YearBUFCMMAROverpaying
10$1,232$883$349
20$4,697$3,394$1,303
30$13,429$9,792$3,637

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC
  • 0.49%MMAR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

MMAR 5th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs MMAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
MMAR None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MMARAll MMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs MMAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024MMAR No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024MMAR No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023MMAR No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26MMAR 0.35

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MMARCvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (March) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MMARCvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (March) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MMARCvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (March) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.