BUFP ranks 1st and BUFG 18th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
BUFG vs BUFP
BUFP −0.63pt a year
1.13%0.50%
BUFP 2.4×the volume
30.5K72.1K
BUFG vs BUFP Performance
+9.6%+10.7%
- BUFG 1.13%
- BUFP 0.50%, better
- BUFG $330M
- BUFP $338M
- BUFG +9.6%
- BUFP +10.7%, better
- BUFG
- BUFP 0.01%
- BUFG 8
- BUFP 15
- BUFG 30.5K sh
- BUFP 72.1K sh, better
- BUFG $29.76
- BUFP $33.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFG | BUFP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D27 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | C48 |
| Holdings | C44 | A71Higher |
| Durability | A70Higher | C53 |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. BUFG and BUFP are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFGD
BUFPB
In short
BUFG One ticket instead of a calendar. BUFG holds a basket of buffered ETFs, each tied to the price return of a big S&P 500 fund up to a cap with a defined cushion against losses, so you skip picking an outcome month yourself.
BUFP Most buffer funds make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFP skips the choice: it owns twelve PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFs, one per calendar month, so part of the ladder resets on a rolling basis.
Stated mandate
BUFG The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing in ETFs designed to provide returns based on SPY’s price return up to a predetermined cap, with a defined buffer against SPY losses over a one-year period.
BUFP The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure obtained via a laddered portfolio of twelve PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETFs. The underlying ETFs seek limited downside protection and capped upside over a specified period, while the Fund itself has no stated buffer.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFG vs BUFP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFG vs BUFP Cost
Overpaying BUFG vs BUFP
$10,785
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFG 1.13%
$20,764
BUFP 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFG | BUFP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,981 | $900 | $1,081 |
| 20 | $7,403 | $3,460 | $3,943 |
| 30 | $20,764 | $9,979 | $10,785 |
- 1.13%BUFG
- 0.50%BUFP, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
BUFP 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BUFG 17th cheapest of 18 funds
BUFG vs BUFP Dividends
- BUFG
- BUFP 0.01%
- BUFG None
- BUFP $0.0024
- BUFG
- BUFP $0.0024
- BUFG
- BUFP Dec 30, 2025
- BUFG
- BUFP Jan 2, 2026
- BUFG
- BUFP Irregular
Distribution history
BUFG vs BUFP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFG 7.8%BUFP 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFG 1.32BUFP 1.21
- Worst fall
- BUFG −17.6%BUFP −12.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFG 0.67BUFP 0.50
Popular comparisons
- 1.13% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.