IVVM ranks 4th and BUFG 18th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
BUFG vs IVVM
IVVM −0.63pt a year
1.13%0.50%
BUFG 1.04×the volume
30.5K29.2K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+15.4%+15.4%
BUFG vs IVVM Performance
+9.6%+9.3%
- BUFG 1.13%
- IVVM 0.50%, better
- BUFG $330M
- IVVM $198M
- BUFG +9.6%, better
- IVVM +9.3%
- BUFG
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFG 8
- IVVM 6
- BUFG 30.5K sh, better
- IVVM 29.2K sh
- BUFG $29.76
- IVVM $37.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFG | IVVM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D27 | D34Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | C44Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A70Higher | B69 |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. BUFG and IVVM are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFGD
IVVMB
In short
BUFG One ticket instead of a calendar. BUFG holds a basket of buffered ETFs, each tied to the price return of a big S&P 500 fund up to a cap with a defined cushion against losses, so you skip picking an outcome month yourself.
IVVM Most buffer funds make you pick a start date. IVVM runs overlapping three-month tranches on IVV, each cushioning roughly the first 5% of losses in exchange for a cap, so no single reset date decides everything.
Stated mandate
BUFG The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing in ETFs designed to provide returns based on SPY’s price return up to a predetermined cap, with a defined buffer against SPY losses over a one-year period.
IVVM The fund seeks exposure to large-cap U.S. equities while using staggered-maturity buffers to protect approximately the first 5% of losses. It accepts limited upside and uses the laddered structure to reduce timing risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFG vs IVVM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFG vs IVVM Cost
Overpaying BUFG vs IVVM
$10,785
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFG 1.13%
$20,764
IVVM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFG | IVVM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,981 | $900 | $1,081 |
| 20 | $7,403 | $3,460 | $3,943 |
| 30 | $20,764 | $9,979 | $10,785 |
- 1.13%BUFG
- 0.50%IVVM, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
IVVM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BUFG 17th cheapest of 18 funds
BUFG vs IVVM Dividends
- BUFG
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFG None
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFG
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFG
- IVVM Dec 23, 2025
- BUFG
- IVVM Dec 29, 2025
- BUFG
- IVVM Annual
Distribution history
BUFG vs IVVM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFG 7.8%IVVM 6.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFG 1.32IVVM 1.56, better
- Worst fall
- BUFG −17.6%IVVM −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFG 0.67IVVM 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 1.13% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.