Skip to content

BUFP vs BUFR

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

BUFPBCboe

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF

BUFRCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

BUFP −0.45pt a year

BUFP0.50%BUFR0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFR 17.5×the volume

BUFP72.1KBUFR1.26M

BUFP vs BUFR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+10.2%BUFP+10.5%BUFR

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. BUFP +10.2%. BUFR +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BUFP 0.50%, better
BUFR 0.95%
Fund size
BUFP $336M
BUFR $10.9B
1Y total return
BUFP +10.2%
BUFR +10.5%, better
Yield (12M)
BUFP 0.01%
BUFR No data
Holdings
BUFP 14
BUFR 13
Avg volume (30D)
BUFP 72.1K sh
BUFR 1.26M sh, better
NAV per share
BUFP $32.75
BUFR $37.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFP: Cost 85, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings 71, Durability 53. BUFR: Cost 24, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 91, Holdings 71, Durability 92.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFP, BUFR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFPBUFR
Cost30% weightA85HigherF24
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB61HigherC47
Tradability15% weightC48A91Higher
Holdings10% weightA71A71
Durability5% weightC53A92Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFP and BUFR are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Laddered Buffer⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

BUFP ranks 1st and BUFR 8th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFPPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFScore 69
  2. Rank 2BPBFRPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETFScore 68
  3. Rank 8CBUFDFT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 8CBUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 8CSPBXAllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFPBPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

BUFRCFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF

In short

BUFP Most buffer funds make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFP skips the choice: it owns twelve PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFs, one per calendar month, so part of the ladder resets on a rolling basis.

BUFR Most buffer ETFs make you pick a start month. BUFR skips the calendar: twelve underlying FT Vest buffer funds on a rolling monthly ladder, each cushioning the first 10% of S&P 500 ETF losses in exchange for a cap.

Stated mandate

BUFP The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure obtained via a laddered portfolio of twelve PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETFs. The underlying ETFs seek limited downside protection and capped upside over a specified period, while the Fund itself has no stated buffer.

BUFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure and a laddered portfolio of twelve underlying buffer ETFs. Those underlying ETFs seek SPY price-return exposure up to caps while buffering the first 10% of SPY losses.

Why people hold it

  • BUFP Twelve underlying buffer ETFs, one for each month, spread the entry point instead of locking everything to a single outcome period and a single cap.pgim.com
  • Each underlying ETF targets a buffer against the first 12% (before fees) of SPY's price-return losses over a one-year period, paired with an upside cap.pgim.com
  • A 0.50% fee sits well under the 0.79% typical of buffer peers, and the package ranks among the stronger implementations in that group.
  • BUFR The ladder is the whole idea: twelve underlying buffer funds resetting on a staggered schedule, so one purchase date doesn't lock you into a single year's cap and buffer.ftportfolios.com
  • Each sleeve is built to absorb the first 10% of SPY's price decline over its outcome period. A defined cushion written into the fund's documents, not a manager's judgment call.
  • One ticker replaces a twelve-fund do-it-yourself ladder, and it's a multi-billion-dollar, actively traded name in a corner of the market full of thin ones.
  • Running since 2020, it sits in the upper half of its buffer peer group on our review, with a wide underlying basket rather than a single-month bet.

Worth knowing

  • BUFP The wrapper itself has no stated buffer. PGIM notes it likely won't get the full benefit of the underlying buffers, and their caps limit its upside.pgim.com
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than at the category's giants. Matters most on larger orders.
  • Live since 2024, so the record is short. PSFF, the other fund-of-buffer-ETFs in the group, carries a lower fee.
  • BUFR The convenience costs: 0.95% a year, richer than the typical fund in its buffer group, and cheaper defensive structures exist (SWAN at 0.49%, DMAX at 0.53%).
  • Caps are the trade for the cushion. The sleeves track SPY's price return only, so dividends and the top of a big rally stay outside the deal.
  • Laddering blends outcomes rather than delivering one: each sleeve sits at a different point in its own period, so your protection at any moment is partial, not a clean 10% floor.

Full BUFP profile⁠

Full BUFR profile⁠

BUFP vs BUFR Holdings

How BUFP and BUFR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BUFP and 0.0% of BUFR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in BUFP and BUFR, widest gap first
SectorMore in BUFPMore in BUFR
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BUFP and BUFR, widest gap first
CountryMore in BUFPMore in BUFR
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BUFP83.4%
  • BUFR83.4%

Securities held

  • BUFP13
  • BUFR12

Asset class

BUFP
Alternatives
BUFR
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in BUFP13
  • In both0
  • Only in BUFR12

Only in BUFP

13 securities, 100% of BUFP by weight

  • Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - February8.39%
  • Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - April8.36%
  • Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - March8.34%

Only in BUFR

12 securities, 100% of BUFR by weight

  • FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October8.43%
  • FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November8.38%
  • FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September8.36%

Weight gaps

BUFP and BUFR share no securities.

All BUFP holdings⁠All 12 BUFR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFP vs BUFR Cost

Overpaying BUFR vs BUFP

$7,890

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • BUFR 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFP 0.50%
  • BUFR 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BUFR $17,869BUFP $9,979

Year by year

YearBUFPBUFROverpaying
10$900$1,678$778
20$3,460$6,322$2,862
30$9,979$17,869$7,890

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%BUFP, cheaper
  • 0.95%BUFR
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

BUFP 2nd cheapest of 18 funds

BUFR 12th cheapest of 18 funds

BUFP vs BUFR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
BUFP 0.01%
BUFR No data
Payout (12M)
BUFP $0.0024
BUFR None
Last payment
BUFP $0.0024
BUFR No data
Ex-dividend
BUFP Dec 30, 2025
BUFR No data
Paid on
BUFP Jan 2, 2026
BUFR No data
Frequency
BUFP Irregular
BUFR No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

BUFPIrregular · 2 paymentsAll BUFP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2024 $0.0047; Dec 30, 2025 $0.0024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0052026YTD
BUFRAll BUFR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFP vs BUFR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFP 6.0%since Jul 2024BUFR 7.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFP 1.21since Jul 2024BUFR 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFP −12.0%since Jun 2024BUFR −13.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFP 0.50BUFR 0.61

BUFP and BUFR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BUFPBvsPBFRB

    PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFRCvsPBFRB

    FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFPBvsALDBB

    PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF · Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFRCvsALDBB

    FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFPBvsIVVMB

    PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF · iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFRCvsIVVMB

    FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.