IVVM ranks 4th and BUFR 8th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
BUFR vs IVVM
0.0%by weight
IVVM −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
BUFR 43.3×the volume
1.26M29.2K
BUFR +0.3pt
+14.8%+14.5%
BUFR vs IVVM Performance
+10.5%+8.9%
- BUFR 0.95%
- IVVM 0.50%, better
- BUFR $10.9B
- IVVM $198M
- BUFR +10.5%, better
- IVVM +8.9%
- BUFR
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFR 13
- IVVM 6
- BUFR 1.26M sh, better
- IVVM 29.2K sh
- BUFR $37.40
- IVVM $37.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFR | IVVM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | A71Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A92Higher | B69 |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. BUFR and IVVM are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFRC
IVVMB
In short
BUFR Most buffer ETFs make you pick a start month. BUFR skips the calendar: twelve underlying FT Vest buffer funds on a rolling monthly ladder, each cushioning the first 10% of S&P 500 ETF losses in exchange for a cap.
IVVM Most buffer funds make you pick a start date. IVVM runs overlapping three-month tranches on IVV, each cushioning roughly the first 5% of losses in exchange for a cap, so no single reset date decides everything.
Stated mandate
BUFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure and a laddered portfolio of twelve underlying buffer ETFs. Those underlying ETFs seek SPY price-return exposure up to caps while buffering the first 10% of SPY losses.
IVVM The fund seeks exposure to large-cap U.S. equities while using staggered-maturity buffers to protect approximately the first 5% of losses. It accepts limited upside and uses the laddered structure to reduce timing risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFR vs IVVM Holdings
How BUFR and IVVM differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BUFR and 0.0% of IVVM.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in BUFRMore in IVVM | BUFR | IVVM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | IVVM +0.3 points | 40.1% | 40.4% |
| Financials | BUFR +0.1 points | 11.3% | 11.2% |
| Health Care | BUFR +0.1 points | 9.4% | 9.3% |
| Industrials | BUFR +0.1 points | 7.6% | 7.5% |
| Consumer Staples | BUFR +0.1 points | 4.4% | 4.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BUFRMore in IVVM | BUFR | IVVM |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | BUFR +0.4 points | 100.0% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | IVVM +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| China | IVVM +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BUFR83.4%
- IVVM101.7%
- BUFR12
- IVVM4
Asset class
- BUFR
- Multi-Asset
- IVVM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BUFR12
- In both0
- Only in IVVM4
Only in BUFR
12 securities, 100% of BUFR by weight
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October8.43%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November8.38%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September8.36%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March8.36%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December8.34%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February8.33%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January8.33%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April8.32%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July8.30%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June8.28%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May8.27%
- FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August8.27%
Only in IVVM
4 securities, 100% of IVVM by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust98.72%
- FEB27 Ivv Us P @ 759.180.99%
- JAN27 Ivv Us P @ 765.850.92%
- DEC26 Ivv Us P @ 770.740.77%
Weight gaps
BUFR and IVVM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFR vs IVVM Cost
Overpaying BUFR vs IVVM
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFR 0.95%
$17,869
IVVM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFR | IVVM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%BUFR
- 0.50%IVVM, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
IVVM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BUFR 12th cheapest of 18 funds
BUFR vs IVVM Dividends
- BUFR
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFR None
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFR
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFR
- IVVM Dec 23, 2025
- BUFR
- IVVM Dec 29, 2025
- BUFR
- IVVM Annual
Distribution history
BUFR vs IVVM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFR 7.1%IVVM 6.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFR 1.50IVVM 1.56, better
- Worst fall
- BUFR −13.7%IVVM −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFR 0.61IVVM 0.51
BUFR and IVVM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
