Skip to content

BUFP vs BUFZ

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

BUFPBCboe

FT Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF

BUFZCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFP −0.45pt a year

BUFP0.50%BUFZ0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFZ 2.3×the volume

BUFP72.1KBUFZ166K

BUFP vs BUFZ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.7%BUFP+9.0%BUFZ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFP +10.7%. BUFZ +9.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFP 0.50%, better
BUFZ 0.95%
Fund size
BUFP $338M
BUFZ $1.09B
1Y total return
BUFP +10.7%, better
BUFZ +9.0%
Yield (12M)
BUFP 0.01%
BUFZ No data
Holdings
BUFP 15
BUFZ 13
Avg volume (30D)
BUFP 72.1K sh
BUFZ 166K sh, better
NAV per share
BUFP $33.11
BUFZ $28.51
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFP: Cost 85, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings 71, Durability 53. BUFZ: Cost 24, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings 71, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFP, BUFZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFPBUFZ
Cost30% weightA85HigherF24
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB61B63Higher
Tradability15% weightC48B61Higher
Holdings10% weightA71A71
Durability5% weightC53A73Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFP and BUFZ are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Laddered Buffer⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

BUFP ranks 1st and BUFZ 12th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFPPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFScore 69
  2. Rank 2BPBFRPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETFScore 68
  3. Rank 11CBFRZInnovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETFScore 50
  4. Rank 12CBUFZFT Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 13CBUFBInnovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFPBPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

BUFZCFT Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF

In short

BUFP Most buffer funds make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFP skips the choice: it owns twelve PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFs, one per calendar month, so part of the ladder resets on a rolling basis.

BUFZ Buffer funds usually make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFZ skips the calendar: a ladder of FT Vest moderate-buffer ETFs on staggered outcome periods, so one ticker spreads buffered S&P 500 exposure across the cycle.

Stated mandate

BUFP The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure obtained via a laddered portfolio of twelve PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETFs. The underlying ETFs seek limited downside protection and capped upside over a specified period, while the Fund itself has no stated buffer.

BUFZ The fund targets capital growth by obtaining U.S. large-cap equity exposure through multiple moderate-buffer ETFs arranged across rolling maturities, with the structure intended to reduce downside risk.

Why people hold it

  • BUFP Twelve underlying buffer ETFs, one for each month, spread the entry point instead of locking everything to a single outcome period and a single cap.pgim.com
  • Each underlying ETF targets a buffer against the first 12% (before fees) of SPY's price-return losses over a one-year period, paired with an upside cap.pgim.com
  • A 0.50% fee sits well under the 0.79% typical of buffer peers, and the package ranks among the stronger implementations in that group.
  • BUFZ No entry-date roulette. The ladder holds several moderate-buffer funds at different points in their outcome periods, so the buy date matters less than it does with a single-month buffer fund.ftportfolios.com
  • One holding does the work of a do-it-yourself ladder. The rolling and rebalancing across maturities happens inside the fund instead of on your calendar.
  • The underlying exposure is plain vanilla: US large-cap equity referenced to the S&P 500 via SPY, not an exotic custom index.
  • Size and liquidity are real for a niche structure: a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively enough to keep dealing costs from dominating the decision.

Worth knowing

  • BUFP The wrapper itself has no stated buffer. PGIM notes it likely won't get the full benefit of the underlying buffers, and their caps limit its upside.pgim.com
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than at the category's giants. Matters most on larger orders.
  • Live since 2024, so the record is short. PSFF, the other fund-of-buffer-ETFs in the group, carries a lower fee.
  • BUFZ Convenience has a price tag: 0.95% a year, above the buffer-peer median of 0.79%, and above laddered rivals like BUFP (0.50%) and IVVM (0.53%). It sits in the lower half of its peer group.
  • Laddering blurs the buffer. Each sleeve sits at a different stage of its own period, so you hold a blend of partial buffers and partial caps rather than one clean stated buffer.
  • Not an income vehicle. The mandate is capital growth with reduced downside risk, and the fund has not been making distributions.

Full BUFP profile⁠

Full BUFZ profile⁠

BUFP vs BUFZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFP vs BUFZ Cost

Overpaying BUFZ vs BUFP

$7,890

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • BUFZ 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFP 0.50%
  • BUFZ 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BUFZ $17,869BUFP $9,979

Year by year

YearBUFPBUFZOverpaying
10$900$1,678$778
20$3,460$6,322$2,862
30$9,979$17,869$7,890

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%BUFP, cheaper
  • 0.95%BUFZ
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

BUFP 2nd cheapest of 18 funds

BUFZ 12th cheapest of 18 funds

BUFP vs BUFZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BUFP 0.01%
BUFZ No data
Payout (12M)
BUFP $0.0024
BUFZ None
Last payment
BUFP $0.0024
BUFZ No data
Ex-dividend
BUFP Dec 30, 2025
BUFZ No data
Paid on
BUFP Jan 2, 2026
BUFZ No data
Frequency
BUFP Irregular
BUFZ No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

BUFPIrregular · 2 paymentsAll BUFP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2024 $0.0047; Dec 30, 2025 $0.0024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0052026YTD
BUFZAll BUFZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFP vs BUFZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFP 6.0%since Jul 2024BUFZ 5.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFP 1.21since Jul 2024BUFZ 1.46
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFP −12.0%since Jun 2024BUFZ −10.1%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFP 0.50BUFZ 0.42

Popular comparisons

  • BUFPBvsPBFRB

    PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFZCvsPBFRB

    FT Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFPBvsALDBB

    PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF · Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFZCvsALDBB

    FT Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF · Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFPBvsIVVMB

    PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF · iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFZCvsIVVMB

    FT Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.