BUFP ranks 1st and BUFZ 12th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
BUFP vs BUFZ
BUFP −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
BUFZ 2.3×the volume
72.1K166K
BUFP vs BUFZ Performance
+10.7%+9.0%
- BUFP 0.50%, better
- BUFZ 0.95%
- BUFP $338M
- BUFZ $1.09B
- BUFP +10.7%, better
- BUFZ +9.0%
- BUFP 0.01%
- BUFZ
- BUFP 15
- BUFZ 13
- BUFP 72.1K sh
- BUFZ 166K sh, better
- BUFP $33.11
- BUFZ $28.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFP | BUFZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85Higher | F24 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A71 |
| Durability | C53 | A73Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. BUFP and BUFZ are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFPB
BUFZC
In short
BUFP Most buffer funds make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFP skips the choice: it owns twelve PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFs, one per calendar month, so part of the ladder resets on a rolling basis.
BUFZ Buffer funds usually make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFZ skips the calendar: a ladder of FT Vest moderate-buffer ETFs on staggered outcome periods, so one ticker spreads buffered S&P 500 exposure across the cycle.
Stated mandate
BUFP The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure obtained via a laddered portfolio of twelve PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETFs. The underlying ETFs seek limited downside protection and capped upside over a specified period, while the Fund itself has no stated buffer.
BUFZ The fund targets capital growth by obtaining U.S. large-cap equity exposure through multiple moderate-buffer ETFs arranged across rolling maturities, with the structure intended to reduce downside risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFP vs BUFZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFP vs BUFZ Cost
Overpaying BUFZ vs BUFP
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFP 0.50%
$9,979
BUFZ 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFP | BUFZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%BUFP, cheaper
- 0.95%BUFZ
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
BUFP 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BUFZ 12th cheapest of 18 funds
BUFP vs BUFZ Dividends
- BUFP 0.01%
- BUFZ
- BUFP $0.0024
- BUFZ None
- BUFP $0.0024
- BUFZ
- BUFP Dec 30, 2025
- BUFZ
- BUFP Jan 2, 2026
- BUFZ
- BUFP Irregular
- BUFZ
Distribution history
BUFP vs BUFZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFP 6.0%BUFZ 5.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFP 1.21BUFZ 1.46
- Worst fall
- BUFP −12.0%BUFZ −10.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFP 0.50BUFZ 0.42
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.