IVVM ranks 4th and BUFZ 12th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
BUFZ vs IVVM
IVVM −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
BUFZ 5.7×the volume
166K29.2K
IVVM +2.6pt
+12.8%+15.4%
BUFZ vs IVVM Performance
+9.0%+9.3%
- BUFZ 0.95%
- IVVM 0.50%, better
- BUFZ $1.09B
- IVVM $198M
- BUFZ +9.0%
- IVVM +9.3%, better
- BUFZ
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFZ 13
- IVVM 6
- BUFZ 166K sh, better
- IVVM 29.2K sh
- BUFZ $28.51
- IVVM $37.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFZ | IVVM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | B61 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A73Higher | B69 |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. BUFZ and IVVM are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFZC
IVVMB
In short
BUFZ Buffer funds usually make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFZ skips the calendar: a ladder of FT Vest moderate-buffer ETFs on staggered outcome periods, so one ticker spreads buffered S&P 500 exposure across the cycle.
IVVM Most buffer funds make you pick a start date. IVVM runs overlapping three-month tranches on IVV, each cushioning roughly the first 5% of losses in exchange for a cap, so no single reset date decides everything.
Stated mandate
BUFZ The fund targets capital growth by obtaining U.S. large-cap equity exposure through multiple moderate-buffer ETFs arranged across rolling maturities, with the structure intended to reduce downside risk.
IVVM The fund seeks exposure to large-cap U.S. equities while using staggered-maturity buffers to protect approximately the first 5% of losses. It accepts limited upside and uses the laddered structure to reduce timing risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFZ vs IVVM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFZ vs IVVM Cost
Overpaying BUFZ vs IVVM
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFZ 0.95%
$17,869
IVVM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFZ | IVVM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%BUFZ
- 0.50%IVVM, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
IVVM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BUFZ 12th cheapest of 18 funds
BUFZ vs IVVM Dividends
- BUFZ
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFZ None
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFZ
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFZ
- IVVM Dec 23, 2025
- BUFZ
- IVVM Dec 29, 2025
- BUFZ
- IVVM Annual
Distribution history
BUFZ vs IVVM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFZ 5.4%, betterIVVM 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFZ 1.46IVVM 1.56, better
- Worst fall
- BUFZ −10.1%IVVM −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFZ 0.42IVVM 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.