SIZE ranks 3rd and CALF 21st of 30 funds in the US Factor Index Category.
CALF vs SIZE
SIZE −0.44pt a year
0.59%0.15%
CALF 100.3×the volume
523K5.21K
CALF +0.5pt
+8.0%+7.5%
CALF vs SIZE Performance
+47.2%+43.6%
- CALF 0.59%
- SIZE 0.15%, better
- CALF $3.84B
- SIZE $433M
- CALF +36.6%, better
- SIZE +13.8%
- CALF 1.09%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- CALF 201
- SIZE 518
- CALF 523K sh, better
- SIZE 5.21K sh
- CALF $58.47
- SIZE $180.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CALF | SIZE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A81Higher |
| Mission | D34 | A93Higher |
| Risk | C47 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | A79 | A88Higher |
| Durability | C46 | B57Higher |
Rank among US Factor Index funds
Same Category. CALF and SIZE are both graded against the same 30 US Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CALFD
SIZEA
In short
CALF Small caps, one filter: cash. CALF ranks the S&P US small-cap universe by free cash flow yield and keeps the top 200, a cash-first alternative to the usual book-value screens. Running since 2017.
SIZE The size factor without leaving the large-cap pool: SIZE holds roughly 500 US stocks and leans toward the smaller names in that universe, spreading weight away from the mega-cap giants. An iShares factor original from 2013.
Stated mandate
CALF The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by screening the S&P US SmallCap universe and selecting the top 200 small-cap companies based on free cash flow yield.
SIZE The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks that have smaller market capitalizations relative to their peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CALF vs SIZE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CALF vs SIZE Cost
Overpaying CALF vs SIZE
$8,498
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CALF 0.59%
$11,635
SIZE 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CALF | SIZE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $274 | $784 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $1,071 | $2,980 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $3,137 | $8,498 |
- 0.59%CALF
- 0.15%SIZE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Factor Index funds
- Median 0.30%
SIZE 5th cheapest of 30 funds
CALF 26th cheapest of 30 funds
CALF vs SIZE Dividends
- CALF 1.09%
- SIZE 1.37%, better
- CALF $0.64
- SIZE $2.47
- CALF $0.19
- SIZE $0.65
- CALF Sep 3, 2026
- SIZE Sep 15, 2026
- CALF Sep 8, 2026
- SIZE Sep 18, 2026
- CALF Quarterly
- SIZE Quarterly
Distribution history
CALF vs SIZE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CALF
- SIZE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CALF 20.1%SIZE 13.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CALF 0.58SIZE 1.06, better
- Worst fall
- CALF −34.2%SIZE −24.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CALF 1.03SIZE 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.