ITM ranks 2nd and CAM 6th of 19 funds in the Intermediate Municipal Bonds Category.
CAM vs ITM
ITM −0.09pt a year
0.27%0.18%
ITM 3.2×the volume
200K648K
CAM vs ITM Performance
+0.9%+0.1%
- CAM 0.27%
- ITM 0.18%, better
- CAM $1.23B
- ITM $2.33B
- CAM +0.9%, better
- ITM +0.1%
- CAM
- ITM 3.08%
- CAM 446
- ITM 1418
- CAM 200K sh
- ITM 648K sh, better
- CAM $24.62
- ITM $45.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAM | ITM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A95 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B57Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A71Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | C41 | B68Higher |
| Durability | B58 | A91Higher |
Rank among Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. CAM and ITM are both graded against the same 19 Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CAMA
ITMA
In short
CAM An actively run California muni portfolio in ETF form: roughly 400 bonds chosen to keep income out of both federal and California state tax, with duration steered to the 3.5 to 7 year middle lane.
ITM Most big muni ETFs buy the whole curve. ITM, running since 2007, sticks to the middle: a passive, AMT-free national index of roughly 1,400 bonds, paid out monthly, for 0.18% a year.
Stated mandate
CAM The fund seeks to preserve principal and maximize total return after federal and state taxes for California residents. It actively invests primarily in California municipal bonds and targets a 3.5–7 year duration.
ITM The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the ICE Intermediate AMT-Free Broad National Municipal Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAM vs ITM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAM vs ITM Cost
Overpaying CAM vs ITM
$1,808
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAM 0.27%
$5,557
ITM 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAM | ITM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $491 | $328 | $163 |
| 20 | $1,907 | $1,281 | $626 |
| 30 | $5,557 | $3,749 | $1,808 |
- 0.27%CAM
- 0.18%ITM, cheaper
- Middle half of Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.30%
ITM 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
CAM 5th cheapest of 19 funds
CAM vs ITM Dividends
- CAM
- ITM 3.08%
- CAM
- ITM $1.41
- CAM $0.06
- ITM $0.11
- CAM Oct 1, 2026
- ITM Oct 1, 2026
- CAM Oct 6, 2026
- ITM Oct 6, 2026
- CAM Monthly
- ITM Monthly
Distribution history
CAM vs ITM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAM 4.8%ITM 6.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CAM −0.57ITM 0.05
- Worst fall
- CAM −4.2%ITM −14.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CAM 0.60ITM 0.97
CAM and ITM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.27% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

