MMIT ranks 4th and CAM 6th of 19 funds in the Intermediate Municipal Bonds Category.
CAM vs MMIT
CAM −0.03pt a year
0.27%0.30%
MMIT 3.5×the volume
200K689K
CAM vs MMIT Performance
+0.9%+0.7%
- CAM 0.27%, better
- MMIT 0.30%
- CAM $1.23B
- MMIT $1.45B
- CAM +0.9%, better
- MMIT +0.7%
- CAM
- MMIT 4.02%
- CAM 446
- MMIT 963
- CAM 200K sh
- MMIT 689K sh, better
- CAM $24.62
- MMIT $23.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAM | MMIT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | C53 |
| Mission | A95 | A99Higher |
| Risk | B57Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A71 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | C41 | A79Higher |
| Durability | B58 | B66Higher |
Rank among Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. CAM and MMIT are both graded against the same 19 Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CAMA
MMITA
In short
CAM An actively run California muni portfolio in ETF form: roughly 400 bonds chosen to keep income out of both federal and California state tax, with duration steered to the 3.5 to 7 year middle lane.
MMIT Active muni bond-picking in an ETF wrapper. MacKay Shields' municipal desk has run MMIT since 2017, sifting roughly 900 investment-grade, AMT-free bonds for income exempt from federal tax, and paying it out monthly.
Stated mandate
CAM The fund seeks to preserve principal and maximize total return after federal and state taxes for California residents. It actively invests primarily in California municipal bonds and targets a 3.5–7 year duration.
MMIT The Fund seeks current income exempt from federal income tax.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAM vs MMIT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAM vs MMIT Cost
Overpaying MMIT vs CAM
$592
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAM 0.27%
$5,557
MMIT 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAM | MMIT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $491 | $545 | $54 |
| 20 | $1,907 | $2,113 | $206 |
| 30 | $5,557 | $6,149 | $592 |
- 0.27%CAM, cheaper
- 0.30%MMIT
- Middle half of Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.30%
CAM 5th cheapest of 19 funds
MMIT 8th cheapest of 19 funds
CAM vs MMIT Dividends
- CAM
- MMIT 4.02%
- CAM
- MMIT $0.95
- CAM $0.06
- MMIT $0.07
- CAM Oct 1, 2026
- MMIT Oct 30, 2026
- CAM Oct 6, 2026
- MMIT Pays Nov 3, 2026
- CAM Monthly
- MMIT Monthly
Distribution history
CAM vs MMIT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAM 4.8%MMIT 5.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CAM −0.57MMIT −0.01
- Worst fall
- CAM −4.2%MMIT −12.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CAM 0.60MMIT 0.73
CAM and MMIT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.27% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

