SCMB ranks 4th and CATF 20th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
CATF vs SCMB
SCMB −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SCMB 122.1×the volume
26.8K3.28M
CATF vs SCMB Performance
+0.8%−0.5%
- CATF 0.25%
- SCMB 0.03%, better
- CATF $161M
- SCMB $4.07B
- CATF +0.8%, better
- SCMB −0.5%
- CATF 3.59%
- SCMB 3.97%, better
- CATF 399
- SCMB 8205
- CATF 26.8K sh
- SCMB 3.28M sh, better
- CATF $48.73
- SCMB $24.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CATF | SCMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A91 | A96Higher |
| Risk | B68Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | D31 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C43 | A72Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. CATF and SCMB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CATFB
SCMBA
In short
CATF A California-only muni portfolio that is actively run, not index-tracked: roughly 400 investment-grade bonds picked for income exempt from federal and California income taxes, at 0.25% with no fee waiver involved.
SCMB Schwab's take on the core muni sleeve: three basis points, thousands of AMT-free bonds from across the country, and a monthly distribution. Bottom-of-the-table pricing, no frills attached.
Stated mandate
CATF The fund seeks high current income exempt from federal and California income taxes. It primarily invests in investment-grade bonds exempt from those taxes, using top-down credit and duration analysis plus research-driven security selection.
SCMB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the U.S. AMT-free municipal bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CATF vs SCMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CATF vs SCMB Cost
Overpaying CATF vs SCMB
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CATF 0.25%
$5,159
SCMB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CATF | SCMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%CATF
- 0.03%SCMB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
SCMB cheapest of 63 funds
CATF 17th cheapest of 63 funds
CATF vs SCMB Dividends
- CATF 3.59%
- SCMB 3.97%, better
- CATF $1.75
- SCMB $0.98
- CATF $0.11
- SCMB $0.07
- CATF Oct 6, 2026
- SCMB Nov 2, 2026
- CATF Oct 8, 2026
- SCMB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- CATF Monthly
- SCMB Monthly
Distribution history
CATF vs SCMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CATF 5.4%SCMB 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CATF −0.38SCMB −0.04
- Worst fall
- CATF −6.3%SCMB −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CATF 0.19SCMB 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.