Skip to content
etf.net

CAUG vs SQBA

Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

CAUGCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF

SQBA—Cboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CAUG −0.55pt a year

CAUG0.30%SQBA0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

SQBA 4.3×the volume

CAUG582SQBA2.52K

CAUG vs SQBA Performance

Oct 6, 2026 – Nov 6, 2026

−2.8%CAUG−1.3%SQBA

Oct 6, 2026 to Nov 6, 2026. CAUG −2.8%. SQBA −1.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%−0.5%0%Oct 6Oct 21Nov 6
Expense ratio
CAUG 0.30%, better
SQBA 0.85%
Fund size
CAUG $1M
SQBA $5M
Holdings
CAUG 4
SQBA 3
Avg volume (30D)
CAUG 582 sh
SQBA 2.52K sh, better
NAV per share
CAUG $24.81
SQBA $30.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —SQBANot yet graded
CAUG: Cost 83, Risk 31, Mission not scored, Tradability 9, Holdings not scored, Durability 2.
Pillar letters and Scores for CAUG, SQBA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCAUGSQBA
Cost30% weightA83Not scored
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD31Not scored
Tradability15% weightF9Not scored
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF2Not scored

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

CAUG ranks 33rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 32CJULUAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jul ETFScore 41
  2. Rank 33CCAUGCorgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  3. Rank 33CCJULCorgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  4. SQBANot yet graded

CAUG vs SQBA Holdings

How CAUG and SQBA differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: SQBA holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in CAUG and SQBA, widest gap first
SectorMore in CAUGMore in SQBAGap
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
CommunicationSame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CAUG and SQBA, widest gap first
CountryMore in CAUGMore in SQBAGap
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CAUG103.0%
  • SQBA100.2%

Securities held

  • CAUG3
  • SQBA2

Asset class

CAUG
Stocks
SQBA
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in CAUG3
  • In both0
  • Only in SQBA2

Only in CAUG

3 securities, 100% of CAUG by weight

  • Spy 07/30/2027 151.53 C78.59%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202717.01%
  • Spy 07/30/2027 757.67 P6.16%

Only in SQBA

2 securities, 99.3% of SQBA by weight

  • 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.6595.33%
  • 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 765.713.97%

Weight gaps

CAUG and SQBA share no securities.

All CAUG holdings⁠All 4 SQBA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CAUG vs SQBA Cost

Overpaying SQBA vs CAUG

$10,050

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CAUG 0.30%

    $6,149

  • SQBA 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CAUG 0.30%
  • SQBA 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530SQBA $16,199CAUG $6,149

Year by year

YearCAUGSQBAOverpaying
10$545$1,508$963
20$2,113$5,706$3,593
30$6,149$16,199$10,050

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CAUG, cheaper
  • 0.85%SQBA
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

CAUG cheapest of 51 funds

SQBA 37th cheapest of 51 funds

CAUG vs SQBA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026
Payout (12M)
CAUG None
SQBA None

Distribution history

CAUGAll CAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SQBAAll SQBA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CAUG vs SQBA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CAUG 0.00SQBA 0.00Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

CAUG and SQBA in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • CAUGCvsPSMOB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SQBA—vsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CAUGCvsPSMJB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SQBA—vsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CAUGCvsPSMRB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SQBA—vsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.