PSMJ ranks 2nd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PSMJ vs SQBA
0.0%by weight
PSMJ −0.36pt a year
0.49%0.85%
PSMJ 2.4×the volume
5.98K2.52K
PSMJ vs SQBA Performance
−2.9%−1.3%
- PSMJ 0.49%, better
- SQBA 0.85%
- PSMJ $106M
- SQBA $5M
- PSMJ +7.0%
- SQBA
- PSMJ 0.00%
- SQBA
- PSMJ 3
- SQBA 3
- PSMJ 5.98K sh, better
- SQBA 2.52K sh
- PSMJ $33.87
- SQBA $30.53
ETF.net Grade
- —SQBANot yet graded
| Pillar | PSMJ | SQBA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52 | |
| Tradability | C48 | |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Our read on each fund
PSMJB
SQBA—
In short
PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.
Stated mandate
PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSMJ vs SQBA Holdings
How PSMJ and SQBA differ
0.0%
About this figure: SQBA holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in PSMJMore in SQBA | Gap | PSMJ | SQBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 38.2% | 38.2% | |
| Financials | Same weight | 12.0% | 12.0% | |
| Health Care | Same weight | 10.3% | 10.3% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 9.2% | 9.2% | |
| Communication | Same weight | 8.4% | 8.4% | |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% | |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.9% | 4.9% | |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.9% | 3.9% | |
| Utilities | Same weight | 2.1% | 2.1% | |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.8% | 1.8% | |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PSMJMore in SQBA | Gap | PSMJ | SQBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% | |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% | |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- PSMJ102.9%
- SQBA100.2%
- PSMJ2
- SQBA2
Asset class
- PSMJ
- Stocks
- SQBA
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in PSMJ2
- In both0
- Only in SQBA2
Only in PSMJ
2 securities, 100% of PSMJ by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 8.29 C96.80%
- Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P5.42%
Only in SQBA
2 securities, 99.3% of SQBA by weight
- 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.6595.33%
- 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 765.713.97%
Weight gaps
PSMJ and SQBA share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSMJ vs SQBA Cost
Overpaying SQBA vs PSMJ
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSMJ 0.49%
$9,792
SQBA 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSMJ | SQBA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,508 | $625 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $5,706 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $16,199 | $6,407 |
- 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
- 0.85%SQBA
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds
SQBA 37th cheapest of 51 funds
PSMJ vs SQBA Dividends
- PSMJ 0.00%
- SQBA
- PSMJ None
- SQBA None
Distribution history
PSMJ vs SQBA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSMJ 6.3%SQBA
- Return per unit of risk
- PSMJ 1.47SQBA
- Worst fall
- PSMJ −10.9%SQBA
- Market sensitivity
- PSMJ 0.47SQBA 0.00
PSMJ and SQBA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
