XOCT ranks 20th and CAUG 33rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
CAUG vs XOCT
0.0%by weight
CAUG −0.55pt a year
0.30%0.85%
XOCT 37.5×the volume
41015.4K
CAUG vs XOCT Performance
−0.4%0.0%
- CAUG 0.30%, better
- XOCT 0.85%
- CAUG $1M
- XOCT $38M
- CAUG
- XOCT +8.3%
- CAUG 4
- XOCT 4
- CAUG 410 sh
- XOCT 15.4K sh, better
- CAUG $25.21
- XOCT $40.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAUG | XOCT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F13 |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | C48 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | F14 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | |
| Durability | F2 | B64Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. CAUG and XOCT are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CAUGC
XOCTC
In short
XOCT Most buffer funds hand over upside to buy protection. This one leans the other way: roughly 2x the price move of the S&P 500 ETF it references, up to a yearly cap, with the first 15% of losses cushioned. October is its reset month.
Stated mandate
XOCT The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to a 10.26% upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAUG vs XOCT Holdings
How CAUG and XOCT differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CAUG and 0.0% of XOCT.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in CAUGMore in XOCT | CAUG | XOCT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CAUGMore in XOCT | CAUG | XOCT |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CAUG102.8%
- XOCT112.1%
- CAUG3
- XOCT3
Asset class
- CAUG
- Equity
- XOCT
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in CAUG3
- In both0
- Only in XOCT3
Only in CAUG
3 securities, 100% of CAUG by weight
- Spy 07/30/2027 151.53 C80.17%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202716.73%
- Spy 07/30/2027 757.67 P4.74%
Only in XOCT
3 securities, 100% of XOCT by weight
- 2027-10-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.7997.28%
- 2027-10-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 763.108.16%
- 2027-10-15 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 763.105.49%
Weight gaps
CAUG and XOCT share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAUG vs XOCT Cost
Overpaying XOCT vs CAUG
$10,050
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAUG 0.30%
$6,149
XOCT 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAUG | XOCT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,508 | $963 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,706 | $3,593 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $16,199 | $10,050 |
- 0.30%CAUG, cheaper
- 0.85%XOCT
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
CAUG cheapest of 51 funds
XOCT 37th cheapest of 51 funds
CAUG vs XOCT Dividends
- CAUG None
- XOCT None
Distribution history
CAUG vs XOCT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAUG XOCT 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CAUG XOCT 1.16
- Worst fall
- CAUG XOCT −10.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CAUG 0.00XOCT 0.34
CAUG and XOCT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
