EMLC ranks 1st and CBON 7th of 7 funds in the Emerging Markets Bonds (Local Currency) Category.
CBON vs EMLC
EMLC −0.20pt a year
0.50%0.30%
EMLC 248.7×the volume
8.52K2.12M
CBON +2.1pt
+3.3%+1.2%
CBON vs EMLC Performance
+11.6%+12.6%
- CBON 0.50%
- EMLC 0.30%, better
- CBON $34M
- EMLC $4.89B
- CBON +9.8%, better
- EMLC +2.6%
- CBON 1.41%
- EMLC 6.50%, better
- CBON 44
- EMLC 531
- CBON 8.52K sh
- EMLC 2.12M sh, better
- CBON $24.25
- EMLC $24.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CBON | EMLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A80Higher |
| Mission | F8 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | F10 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A89Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A73Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Bonds (Local Currency) funds
Same Category. CBON and EMLC are both graded against the same 7 Emerging Markets Bonds (Local Currency) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CBOND
EMLCA
In short
CBON The first US-listed ETF to open China's onshore bond market to American buyers, back in 2014. One country, one currency, a few dozen RMB bonds from government, policy-bank and credit issuers.
EMLC Emerging-market governments borrowing in their own money, not dollars. EMLC has run that trade since 2010, holding roughly 500 local-currency sovereign bonds and paying monthly. You own the yields and the currencies, unhedged.
Stated mandate
CBON The fund seeks to replicate the price and yield performance of the FTSE Chinese Broad Bond 0–10 Diversified Select Index before fees and expenses. The index covers fixed-rate, RMB-denominated bonds issued in China by credit, governmental, and quasi-governmental issuers.
EMLC The fund seeks to track the J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global Core Index, which represents local-currency bonds issued by emerging-market governments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CBON vs EMLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CBON vs EMLC Cost
Overpaying CBON vs EMLC
$3,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CBON 0.50%
$9,979
EMLC 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CBON | EMLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $545 | $355 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,113 | $1,347 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $6,149 | $3,830 |
- 0.50%CBON
- 0.30%EMLC, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Bonds (Local Currency) funds
- Median 0.55%
EMLC cheapest of 7 funds
CBON 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
CBON vs EMLC Dividends
- CBON 1.41%
- EMLC 6.50%, better
- CBON $0.34
- EMLC $1.60
- CBON $0.02
- EMLC $0.14
- CBON Oct 1, 2026
- EMLC Oct 1, 2026
- CBON Oct 6, 2026
- EMLC Oct 6, 2026
- CBON Monthly
- EMLC Monthly
Distribution history
CBON vs EMLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CBON
- EMLC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CBON 3.4%, betterEMLC 7.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- CBON 0.53, betterEMLC 0.42
- Worst fall
- CBON −14.1%, betterEMLC −20.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CBON 0.31EMLC 1.11
CBON and EMLC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




