Skip to content
etf.net

CCSO vs SDG

Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF

CCSOBNasdaq

iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF

SDGBNasdaq

Overlap

2.7%by weight

Expense ratio

CCSO −0.15pt a year

CCSO0.35%SDG0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

SDG 1.4×the volume

CCSO2.5KSDG3.63K

3Y return · a year

CCSO +6.3pt

CCSO+14.6%SDG+8.3%

CCSO vs SDG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.7%CCSO+3.7%SDG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CCSO −5.7%. SDG +3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CCSO 0.35%, better
SDG 0.50%
Fund size
CCSO $45M
SDG $160M
1Y total return
CCSO −5.7%
SDG +3.7%, better
Yield (12M)
CCSO 0.64%
SDG 1.75%, better
Holdings
CCSO 124
SDG 144
Avg volume (30D)
CCSO 2.5K sh
SDG 3.63K sh, better
NAV per share
CCSO $24.79
SDG $86.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CCSO: Cost 71, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings 35, Durability 49. SDG: Cost 47, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings 61, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for CCSO, SDG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCCSOSDG
Cost30% weightA71HigherC47
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC46A72Higher
Tradability15% weightB68HigherB60
Holdings10% weightD35B61Higher
Durability5% weightC49A75Higher

Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CCSO and SDG are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Climate & Sustainability⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

CCSO ranks 3rd and SDG 4th of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.

  1. Rank 1AKLMTInvesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2BIQSZInvesco Global Equity Net Zero ETFScore 68
  3. Rank 3BCCSOCarbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETFScore 59
  4. Rank 4BSDGiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 5CERTHInvesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CCSOBCarbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF

SDGBiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF

In short

CCSO The name is the mandate: US-listed companies working on climate-change solutions, in a plain 1940 Act wrapper priced well under the typical US thematic fund.

SDG A global stock fund built on one filter: does the business itself serve the UN's Sustainable Development Goals? About 120 companies worldwide, running since 2016, priced below the typical global thematic fund.

Stated mandate

CCSO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through investments primarily in U.S.-listed equity securities of companies focused on climate-change solutions.

SDG The Fund seeks to track an index of global companies aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

Why people hold it

  • CCSO Costs 0.35% a year, versus a 0.57% median across its US thematic peer group. Cheap is rare in theme funds.
  • The prospectus keeps it tight: long-term capital appreciation from US-listed equities of companies focused on climate-change solutions. No commodity sleeves, no offshore detours.
  • Ordinary open-end fund structure under the 1940 Act. No leverage, no derivatives contract to decode, no K-1 at tax time.
  • Lands in the upper half of its US thematic cohort on our review, which is a crowded field of pricier, narrower ideas.
  • SDG Charges 0.50% a year, under the median fee for global thematic funds in its peer group.
  • Holdings come from a published index, the MSCI ACWI Sustainable Development Index, rather than a manager's judgement call. The rulebook is public.ishares.com
  • About 120 names across global markets, concentrated enough that the theme actually shows up in the portfolio instead of getting diluted.
  • Live since 2016 on BlackRock's iShares platform, a long track record for a theme fund, and it sits in the upper half of its global thematic cohort.

Worth knowing

  • CCSO Small asset base and thin trading. Spreads can widen and large orders move the price, so execution matters more here than in a household-name fund.
  • One theme, one country. A climate-solutions basket can drift a long way from the broad US market in either direction.
  • Cheaper thematic options exist: LRND runs at 0.14% and TECB at 0.30%, though they chase different ideas entirely.
  • SDG Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than on broad index funds and larger orders take more care to fill.
  • The SDG alignment screens leave out large chunks of the world market, so results can drift well away from a plain global index.ishares.com
  • Cheaper sustainability-tilted options share the cohort: Invesco's KLMT runs 0.10%.

Full CCSO profile⁠

Full SDG profile⁠

CCSO vs SDG Holdings

How CCSO and SDG differ

Overlap by weight

2.7%

Shared holdings make up 4.1% of SDG and 3.6% of CCSO.

Level by level

  • Holdings2 in both2.7%
  • Countryby domicile41.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for SDG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CCSO and SDG, widest gap first
CountryMore in CCSOMore in SDG
United StatesCCSO +49.1 points
ChinaSDG +13.2 points
JapanSDG +8.9 points
TaiwanSDG +6.9 points
DenmarkSDG +5.7 points
CanadaCCSO +5.0 points
SwitzerlandSDG +4.1 points
Hong KongSDG +3.1 points
Other countries (12)SDG +12.1 points

Outside the US: SDG 58% developed, 42% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CCSO50.8%
  • SDG36.7%

Securities held

  • CCSO123
  • SDG120

Asset class

CCSO
Equity
SDG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CCSO121
  • In both2
  • Only in SDG118

Only in CCSO

121 securities, 95.9% of CCSO by weight

  • Republic Services Inc6.30%
  • Nucor Corp6.29%
  • Johnson Controls International plc6.02%

Only in SDG

118 securities, 95.3% of SDG by weight

  • Tyson Foods Inc Class A4.22%
  • NVIDIA4.07%
  • Bristol Myers Squibb3.99%

Weight gaps

All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CCSO and SDG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CCSOMore in SDG
First Solar IncFSLRSDG +1.41 points
Rivian Automotive IncRIVNCCSO +0.90 points

All CCSO holdings⁠All 120 SDG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CCSO vs SDG Cost

Overpaying SDG vs CCSO

$2,853

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CCSO 0.35%

    $7,126

  • SDG 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CCSO 0.35%
  • SDG 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530SDG $9,979CCSO $7,126

Year by year

YearCCSOSDGOverpaying
10$634$900$266
20$2,454$3,460$1,006
30$7,126$9,979$2,853

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%CCSO, cheaper
  • 0.50%SDG
  • Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
  • Median 0.48%

CCSO 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

SDG 5th cheapest of 8 funds

CCSO vs SDG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CCSO 0.64%
SDG 1.75%, better
Payout (12M)
CCSO $0.16
SDG $1.51
Last payment
CCSO $0.16
SDG $0.66
Ex-dividend
CCSO Dec 29, 2025
SDG Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
CCSO Dec 30, 2025
SDG Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
CCSO Annual
SDG Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CCSOAnnual · 4 paymentsAll CCSO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2022 $0.04; Dec 26, 2023 $0.16; Dec 27, 2024 $0.11; Dec 29, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
SDGTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll SDG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.77; Dec 19, 2017 $0.74; Jun 19, 2018 $0.80; Dec 18, 2018 $0.51; Jun 17, 2019 $0.55; Dec 16, 2019 $0.36; Jun 15, 2020 $0.49; Dec 14, 2020 $0.41; Jun 10, 2021 $0.45; Dec 13, 2021 $1.05; Jun 9, 2022 $0.74; Dec 13, 2022 $0.70; Jun 7, 2023 $0.68; Dec 20, 2023 $0.76; Jun 11, 2024 $0.80; Dec 17, 2024 $0.59; Jun 16, 2025 $0.83; Dec 16, 2025 $0.85; Jun 15, 2026 $0.66. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

CCSO vs SDG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CCSO 20.1%SDG 12.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CCSO 0.56, betterSDG 0.34
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CCSO −23.7%since Sep 2022SDG −27.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CCSO 1.30SDG 0.80

CCSO and SDG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • CCSOBvsKLMTA

    Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF · Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SDGBvsKLMTA

    iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF · Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CCSOBvsIQSZB

    Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF · Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SDGBvsIQSZB

    iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF · Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CCSOBvsERTHC

    Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF · Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SDGBvsERTHC

    iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF · Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.