Skip to content

CCSO vs KLMT

Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF

CCSOBNasdaq

Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF

KLMTANYSE Arca

Overlap

1.0%by weight

Expense ratio

KLMT −0.25pt a year

CCSO0.35%KLMT0.10%

Avg volume · 30D

CCSO 1.5×the volume

CCSO2.5KKLMT1.72K

CCSO vs KLMT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.7%CCSO+12.4%KLMT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CCSO −5.7%. KLMT +12.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CCSO 0.35%
KLMT 0.10%, better
Fund size
CCSO $45M
KLMT $1.55B
1Y total return
CCSO −5.7%
KLMT +12.4%, better
Yield (12M)
CCSO 0.64%
KLMT 1.82%, better
Holdings
CCSO 124
KLMT 503
Avg volume (30D)
CCSO 2.5K sh, better
KLMT 1.72K sh
NAV per share
CCSO $24.79
KLMT $34.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CCSO: Cost 71, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings 35, Durability 49. KLMT: Cost 93, Risk 75, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 72, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for CCSO, KLMT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCCSOKLMT
Cost30% weightA71A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC46A75Higher
Tradability15% weightB68HigherD35
Holdings10% weightD35A72Higher
Durability5% weightC49A70Higher

Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CCSO and KLMT are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Climate & Sustainability⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

KLMT ranks 1st and CCSO 3rd of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.

  1. Rank 1AKLMTInvesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2BIQSZInvesco Global Equity Net Zero ETFScore 68
  3. Rank 3BCCSOCarbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETFScore 59
  4. Rank 4BSDGiShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CCSOBCarbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF

KLMTAInvesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF

In short

CCSO The name is the mandate: US-listed companies working on climate-change solutions, in a plain 1940 Act wrapper priced well under the typical US thematic fund.

KLMT A climate fund that behaves like a core global index fund: roughly 500 developed and emerging market stocks, full replication, and a 0.10% fee that undercuts most of the thematic aisle.

Stated mandate

CCSO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through investments primarily in U.S.-listed equity securities of companies focused on climate-change solutions.

KLMT The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index before fees and expenses, using full replication of the index.

Why people hold it

  • CCSO Costs 0.35% a year, versus a 0.57% median across its US thematic peer group. Cheap is rare in theme funds.
  • The prospectus keeps it tight: long-term capital appreciation from US-listed equities of companies focused on climate-change solutions. No commodity sleeves, no offshore detours.
  • Ordinary open-end fund structure under the 1940 Act. No leverage, no derivatives contract to decode, no K-1 at tax time.
  • Lands in the upper half of its US thematic cohort on our review, which is a crowded field of pricier, narrower ideas.
  • KLMT Costs 0.10% a year, a fraction of the typical global thematic fund and cheaper than the other top-rated climate names in its group, including LCTD and IQSZ.
  • Holds about 500 names across developed and emerging markets, so it reads like a broad global equity sleeve with a climate screen rather than a narrow theme bet.invesco.com
  • Buys the MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index outright instead of sampling it, and has stayed tight to that index. One of the cleaner implementations in its peer group.invesco.com
  • Pays out quarterly, the standard rhythm for a broad global stock index fund.

Worth knowing

  • CCSO Small asset base and thin trading. Spreads can widen and large orders move the price, so execution matters more here than in a household-name fund.
  • One theme, one country. A climate-solutions basket can drift a long way from the broad US market in either direction.
  • Cheaper thematic options exist: LRND runs at 0.14% and TECB at 0.30%, though they chase different ideas entirely.
  • KLMT Thinly traded for its size. Limit orders and a glance at the spread matter more here than with a mega-cap index fund.
  • Launched in 2024, so the live track record is short and there is not yet a full-cycle history to judge it on.
  • The climate screens reshape the global benchmark, so weights and sector mix will drift from a plain vanilla all-country index.invesco.com

Full CCSO profile⁠

Full KLMT profile⁠

CCSO vs KLMT Holdings

How CCSO and KLMT differ

Overlap by weight

1.0%

Shared holdings make up 36.7% of CCSO and 1.0% of KLMT.

Level by level

  • Holdings8 in both1.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors36.0%
  • Countryby domicile70.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CCSO and KLMT, widest gap first
SectorMore in CCSOMore in KLMT
IndustrialsCCSO +40.8 points
TechnologyKLMT +24.1 points
FinancialsKLMT +15.8 points
MaterialsCCSO +15.4 points
CommunicationKLMT +8.7 points
Health CareKLMT +8.4 points
UtilitiesCCSO +4.6 points
Consumer StaplesKLMT +4.5 points
EnergyCCSO +2.9 points
Real EstateKLMT +2.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryCCSO +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CCSO and KLMT, widest gap first
CountryMore in CCSOMore in KLMT
United StatesCCSO +20.5 points
JapanKLMT +5.0 points
TaiwanKLMT +3.9 points
United KingdomKLMT +3.5 points
CanadaCCSO +3.1 points
IsraelCCSO +2.9 points
SwitzerlandKLMT +2.3 points
South KoreaKLMT +2.0 points
Other countries (22)KLMT +9.8 points

Outside the US: KLMT 73% developed, 27% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CCSO50.8%
  • KLMT24.7%

Securities held

  • CCSO123
  • KLMT500

Asset class

CCSO
Equity
KLMT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CCSO115
  • In both8
  • Only in KLMT492

Only in CCSO

115 securities, 62.8% of CCSO by weight

  • Republic Services Inc6.30%
  • Nucor Corp6.29%
  • Steel Dynamics Inc3.72%

Only in KLMT

492 securities, 98.9% of KLMT by weight

  • Apple Inc5.04%
  • NVIDIA Corp4.85%
  • Microsoft Corp3.70%

Weight gaps

All 8 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CCSO and KLMT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CCSOMore in KLMT
Johnson Controls International plcJCICCSO +5.87 points
Southern Copper CorpSCCOCCSO +5.61 points
Waste Management IncWMCCSO +5.47 points
Quanta Services IncPWRCCSO +4.41 points
Carrier Global CorpCARRCCSO +4.33 points
GE Vernova IncGEVCCSO +4.14 points
Cameco CorpCCJCCSO +3.73 points
Xylem Inc/NYXYLCCSO +2.17 points

All CCSO holdings⁠All 500 KLMT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CCSO vs KLMT Cost

Overpaying CCSO vs KLMT

$5,020

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CCSO 0.35%

    $7,126

  • KLMT 0.10%

    $2,106

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CCSO 0.35%
  • KLMT 0.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CCSO $7,126KLMT $2,106

Year by year

YearCCSOKLMTOverpaying
10$634$183$451
20$2,454$717$1,737
30$7,126$2,106$5,020

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%CCSO
  • 0.10%KLMT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
  • Median 0.48%

KLMT cheapest of 8 funds

CCSO 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

CCSO vs KLMT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CCSO 0.64%
KLMT 1.82%, better
Payout (12M)
CCSO $0.16
KLMT $0.62
Last payment
CCSO $0.16
KLMT $0.14
Ex-dividend
CCSO Dec 29, 2025
KLMT Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
CCSO Dec 30, 2025
KLMT Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
CCSO Annual
KLMT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

CCSOAnnual · 4 paymentsAll CCSO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2022 $0.04; Dec 26, 2023 $0.16; Dec 27, 2024 $0.11; Dec 29, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
KLMTQuarterly · 9 paymentsAll KLMT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Sep 23, 2024 $0.08; Dec 23, 2024 $0.14; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.15; Sep 22, 2025 $0.12; Dec 22, 2025 $0.21; Mar 23, 2026 $0.12; Jun 22, 2026 $0.15; Sep 21, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

CCSO vs KLMT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CCSO 20.1%KLMT 10.8%since Jul 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CCSO 0.56KLMT 1.08since Jul 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CCSO −23.7%since Sep 2022KLMT −16.9%since Jun 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CCSO 1.30KLMT 0.89

Popular comparisons

  • CCSOBvsIQSZB

    Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF · Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KLMTAvsIQSZB

    Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF · Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CCSOBvsSDGB

    Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF · iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KLMTAvsSDGB

    Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF · iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CCSOBvsERTHC

    Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF · Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KLMTAvsERTHC

    Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF · Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.