CEFS ranks 2nd and FCEF 5th of 7 funds in the Closed-End Fund Portfolios Category.
CEFS vs FCEF
CEFS −1.08pt a year
2.61%3.69%
CEFS 5.2×the volume
84.1K16.3K
CEFS +7.3pt
+12.3%+5.0%
CEFS vs FCEF Performance
+78.5%+27.4%
- CEFS 2.61%, better
- FCEF 3.69%
- CEFS $430M
- FCEF $80M
- CEFS +13.4%, better
- FCEF +7.3%
- CEFS 7.38%, better
- FCEF 7.16%
- CEFS 93
- FCEF 59
- CEFS 84.1K sh, better
- FCEF 16.3K sh
- CEFS $24.35
- FCEF $22.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CEFS | FCEF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77Higher | F20 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | C47 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | B61Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A71Higher |
Rank among Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
Same Category. CEFS and FCEF are both graded against the same 7 Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CEFSB
FCEFC
In short
CEFS Saba buys closed-end funds trading below net asset value, then hedges rate risk by shorting Treasuries and bond ETFs. Running since 2017, steered by the firm known for pressing CEF boards to close those discounts.
FCEF One of the few ETFs whose portfolio is other closed-end funds: a manager assembles about 50 income vehicles into a single monthly-paying ticker. The convenience is real, and so is the layered cost.
Stated mandate
CEFS The Fund seeks capital appreciation and dividend income.
FCEF The Fund seeks current income, with total return as a secondary objective. It normally invests in closed-end funds and exchange-traded funds listed on U.S. exchanges.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CEFS vs FCEF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CEFS vs FCEF Cost
Overpaying FCEF vs CEFS
$9,726
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CEFS 2.61%
$39,834
FCEF 3.69%
$49,560
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CEFS | FCEF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $4,305 | $5,822 | $1,517 |
| 20 | $15,082 | $19,517 | $4,435 |
| 30 | $39,834 | $49,560 | $9,726 |
- 2.61%CEFS, cheaper
- 3.69%FCEF
- Middle half of Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
- Median 3.19%
CEFS cheapest of 7 funds
FCEF 6th cheapest of 7 funds
CEFS vs FCEF Dividends
- CEFS 7.38%, better
- FCEF 7.16%
- CEFS $1.77
- FCEF $1.64
- CEFS $0.25
- FCEF $0.14
- CEFS Sep 28, 2026
- FCEF Oct 14, 2026
- CEFS Sep 30, 2026
- FCEF Oct 30, 2026
- CEFS Monthly
- FCEF Monthly
Distribution history
CEFS vs FCEF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CEFS
- FCEF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CEFS 11.5%FCEF 9.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CEFS 1.44, betterFCEF 1.26
- Worst fall
- CEFS −16.8%, betterFCEF −25.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CEFS 0.78FCEF 0.97
Popular comparisons
- 2.61% · 2.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.69% · 2.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.61% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.69% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.61% · 2.82%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.69% · 2.82%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.