PCEF ranks 1st and CEFS 2nd of 7 funds in the Closed-End Fund Portfolios Category.
CEFS vs PCEF
CEFS −0.10pt a year
2.61%2.71%
PCEF 1.5×the volume
84.1K123K
CEFS +8.6pt
+12.3%+3.7%
CEFS vs PCEF Performance
+78.5%+20.0%
- CEFS 2.61%, better
- PCEF 2.71%
- CEFS $430M
- PCEF $743M
- CEFS +13.4%, better
- PCEF +3.2%
- CEFS 7.38%
- PCEF 7.78%, better
- CEFS 93
- PCEF 107
- CEFS 84.1K sh
- PCEF 123K sh, better
- CEFS $24.35
- PCEF $19.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CEFS | PCEF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77Higher | B65 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B62Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | C47 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | A82Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A85Higher |
Rank among Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
Same Category. CEFS and PCEF are both graded against the same 7 Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CEFSB
PCEFB
In short
CEFS Saba buys closed-end funds trading below net asset value, then hedges rate risk by shorting Treasuries and bond ETFs. Running since 2017, steered by the firm known for pressing CEF boards to close those discounts.
PCEF One ticker, roughly 110 closed-end funds. PCEF has tracked the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index since 2010, favoring CEFs priced below net asset value and paying out monthly. Cost: 2.71%, net of a waiver through August 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
CEFS The Fund seeks capital appreciation and dividend income.
PCEF The Fund is based on the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index and normally invests at least 90% of total assets in funds included in that Index. It operates as a fund-of-funds, investing in those funds rather than individual securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CEFS vs PCEF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CEFS vs PCEF Cost
Overpaying PCEF vs CEFS
$1,029
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CEFS 2.61%
$39,834
PCEF 2.71%
$40,863
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CEFS | PCEF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $4,305 | $4,451 | $146 |
| 20 | $15,082 | $15,531 | $449 |
| 30 | $39,834 | $40,863 | $1,029 |
- 2.61%CEFS, cheaper
- 2.71%PCEF
- Middle half of Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
- Median 3.19%
CEFS cheapest of 7 funds
PCEF 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
CEFS vs PCEF Dividends
- CEFS 7.38%
- PCEF 7.78%, better
- CEFS $1.77
- PCEF $1.49
- CEFS $0.25
- PCEF $0.11
- CEFS Sep 28, 2026
- PCEF Oct 19, 2026
- CEFS Sep 30, 2026
- PCEF Oct 23, 2026
- CEFS Monthly
- PCEF Monthly
Distribution history
CEFS vs PCEF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CEFS
- PCEF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CEFS 11.5%PCEF 10.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CEFS 1.44, betterPCEF 0.99
- Worst fall
- CEFS −16.8%, betterPCEF −24.2%
- Market sensitivity
- CEFS 0.78PCEF 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 2.61% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.71% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.61% · 2.82%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.71% · 2.82%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.61% · 3.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.71% · 3.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.