Skip to content

CEFS vs RDFI

Saba Opportunistic Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF

CEFSBCboe

Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF

RDFIDCboe

Overlap

2.9%by weight

Expense ratio

CEFS −1.62pt a year

CEFS2.61%RDFI4.23%

Avg volume · 30D

CEFS 4.4×the volume

CEFS84.1KRDFI19.1K

5Y return · a year

CEFS +10.7pt

CEFS+12.3%RDFI+1.6%

CEFS vs RDFI Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+78.5%CEFS+8.3%RDFI

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CEFS +78.5%. RDFI +8.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%40%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CEFS 2.61%, better
RDFI 4.23%
Fund size
CEFS $430M
RDFI $74M
1Y total return
CEFS +13.4%, better
RDFI −2.2%
Yield (12M)
CEFS 7.38%
RDFI 8.92%, better
Holdings
CEFS 93
RDFI 36
Avg volume (30D)
CEFS 84.1K sh, better
RDFI 19.1K sh
NAV per share
CEFS $24.35
RDFI $21.86
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CEFS: Cost 77, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 34, Durability 59. RDFI: Cost 8, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 100, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for CEFS, RDFI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCEFSRDFI
Cost30% weightA77HigherF8
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB62HigherC42
Tradability15% weightC47B56Higher
Holdings10% weightD34A100Higher
Durability5% weightB59HigherC43

Rank among Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CEFS and RDFI are both graded against the same 7 Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 7 ›

CEFS ranks 2nd and RDFI 7th of 7 funds in the Closed-End Fund Portfolios Category.

  1. Rank 1BPCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BCEFSSaba Opportunistic Hedged Closed-End Funds ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3CYYYAmplify CEF High Income ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 6CCCEFCalamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 7DRDFIRareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CEFSBSaba Opportunistic Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF

RDFIDRareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF

In short

CEFS Saba buys closed-end funds trading below net asset value, then hedges rate risk by shorting Treasuries and bond ETFs. Running since 2017, steered by the firm known for pressing CEF boards to close those discounts.

RDFI A fund of closed-end bond funds with a hand on the wheel: Rareview buys CEFs trading away from their net asset value for the monthly cash, then short-sells Treasury futures when it wants less interest-rate risk.

Stated mandate

CEFS The Fund seeks capital appreciation and dividend income.

RDFI The Fund seeks total return with an emphasis on current income. It invests primarily in fixed-income closed-end funds and may vary allocations across several fixed-income segments.

Why people hold it

  • CEFS At 2.61%, it undercuts the CEF-of-funds peers beside it: PCEF 2.71% (net of a waiver through August 31, 2027), CEFZ 2.82%, YYY 3.23%, FCEF 3.69%. Also below the category median.
  • Two levers, both in the prospectus: own CEFs priced under their net asset value, and short Treasuries or bond-index ETFs to damp interest-rate exposure.sec.gov
  • The sub-adviser is not a passenger. Saba Capital runs activist campaigns at closed-end funds, pushing boards for tender offers near NAV and governance change.cnbc.comsec.gov
  • Live since March 2017 under Saba, with a few hundred million in assets and a seat in the upper half of a small peer group.
  • RDFI Actively run, not a static basket. The adviser can short U.S. Treasury futures to hedge interest-rate risk and rotate across fixed-income segments as its outlook changes.sec.gov
  • Targets closed-end funds trading at a discount or premium to net asset value that pay regular cash distributions, with up to 30% allowed in ETFs when those trade better.sec.gov
  • It can also run a dividend-capture overlay, buying closed-end fund shares around their distribution dates rather than simply holding them.saytechnologies.com
  • Roughly 40 closed-end funds under the hood, and the ETF itself pays monthly.

Worth knowing

  • CEFS Discounts can widen as easily as they narrow, and the hedge is aimed at interest rates, not at equity or credit drawdowns.sec.gov
  • 2.61% is a steep sticker in ETF terms, below the category median but far above plain index funds. Fund-of-funds structures stack costs.
  • The board can reset the distribution rate and schedule on Saba's recommendation, and has done so. Income timing is not fixed.yahoo.com
  • RDFI You pay up for the hands-on work: 4.23%, above the category median and above peers like CEFS at 2.61% and PCEF at 2.71% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027.
  • Two layers of risk: the underlying closed-end funds can use derivatives and borrowing, and the short Treasury futures hedge loses value when Treasury prices rise.sec.gov
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can be wider and sizeable orders can move the price.

Full CEFS profile⁠

Full RDFI profile⁠

CEFS vs RDFI Holdings

How CEFS and RDFI differ

Overlap by weight

2.9%

Shared holdings make up 13.6% of RDFI and 2.9% of CEFS.

Level by level

  • Holdings5 in both2.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors66.4%
  • Countryby domicile88.5%

Sector

Sector weights in CEFS and RDFI, widest gap first
SectorMore in CEFSMore in RDFI
EnergyRDFI +29.0 points
TechnologyCEFS +14.7 points
IndustrialsCEFS +4.7 points
Health CareCEFS +3.4 points
Real EstateRDFI +3.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryCEFS +2.8 points
CommunicationCEFS +2.6 points
FinancialsCEFS +2.3 points
Consumer StaplesCEFS +1.6 points
UtilitiesRDFI +1.4 points
MaterialsCEFS +1.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CEFS and RDFI, widest gap first
CountryMore in CEFSMore in RDFI
United StatesRDFI +11.5 points
United KingdomCEFS +2.4 points
CanadaCEFS +1.7 points
TaiwanCEFS +1.1 points
South KoreaCEFS +0.8 points
ChinaCEFS +0.7 points
JapanCEFS +0.7 points
NetherlandsCEFS +0.6 points
Other countries (28)CEFS +3.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CEFS58.8%
  • RDFI45.6%

Securities held

  • CEFS92
  • RDFI35

Asset class

CEFS
Multi-Asset
RDFI
Fixed Income

Holdings

  • Only in CEFS87
  • In both5
  • Only in RDFI30

Only in CEFS

87 securities, 86.4% of CEFS by weight

  • BlackRock Sci & Tech Trm Tr10.41%
  • Destiny TECH100 Inc7.10%
  • Asa Gold and Precious Metals6.83%

Only in RDFI

30 securities, 85.2% of RDFI by weight

  • BlackRock Credit Allocation5.32%
  • Rareview Government Money5.27%
  • BlackRock Corporate High Yie4.96%

Weight gaps

All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CEFS and RDFI, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CEFSMore in RDFI
Brookfield Real Assets IncomRARDFI +4.16 points
Western Asset Divers IncWDIRDFI +2.43 points
Ubs Am High Yield CreditDHYRDFI +2.15 points
Cohen & Steers Tax-AdvantagePTARDFI +1.89 points
Pimco Dynamic Income StratPDXRDFI +0.07 points

All 115 CEFS holdings⁠All 37 RDFI holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CEFS vs RDFI Cost

Overpaying RDFI vs CEFS

$13,590

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CEFS 2.61%

    $39,834

  • RDFI 4.23%

    $53,424

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CEFS 2.61%
  • RDFI 4.23%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$20K$40K$60K051015202530RDFI $53,424CEFS $39,834

Year by year

YearCEFSRDFIOverpaying
10$4,305$6,529$2,224
20$15,082$21,425$6,343
30$39,834$53,424$13,590

Expense ratio

  • 2.61%CEFS, cheaper
  • 4.23%RDFI
  • Middle half of Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
  • Median 3.19%

CEFS cheapest of 7 funds

RDFI 7th cheapest of 7 funds

CEFS vs RDFI Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CEFS 7.38%
RDFI 8.92%, better
Payout (12M)
CEFS $1.77
RDFI $1.94
Last payment
CEFS $0.25
RDFI $0.16
Ex-dividend
CEFS Sep 28, 2026
RDFI Oct 2, 2026
Paid on
CEFS Sep 30, 2026
RDFI Oct 5, 2026
Frequency
CEFS Monthly
RDFI Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CEFSMonthly · 45 paymentsAll CEFS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 45 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 20, 2023 $0.14; Feb 21, 2023 $0.14; Mar 20, 2023 $0.14; Apr 20, 2023 $0.14; May 22, 2023 $0.14; Jun 20, 2023 $0.14; Jul 20, 2023 $0.14; Aug 21, 2023 $0.14; Sep 20, 2023 $0.14; Oct 20, 2023 $0.14; Nov 20, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.21; Jan 24, 2024 $0.14; Feb 26, 2024 $0.14; Mar 25, 2024 $0.14; Apr 24, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.14; Jun 24, 2024 $0.14; Jul 24, 2024 $0.14; Aug 26, 2024 $0.14; Sep 24, 2024 $0.14; Oct 24, 2024 $0.14; Nov 25, 2024 $0.14; Dec 30, 2024 $0.34; Jan 30, 2025 $0.14; Feb 27, 2025 $0.14; Mar 27, 2025 $0.14; Apr 29, 2025 $0.14; May 29, 2025 $0.14; Jun 26, 2025 $0.14; Jul 30, 2025 $0.14; Aug 28, 2025 $0.14; Sep 29, 2025 $0.14; Oct 30, 2025 $0.14; Nov 25, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.27; Jan 28, 2026 $0.14; Feb 25, 2026 $0.14; Mar 27, 2026 $0.14; Apr 28, 2026 $0.14; May 27, 2026 $0.14; Jun 26, 2026 $0.14; Jul 29, 2026 $0.14; Aug 27, 2026 $0.14; Sep 28, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
RDFIMonthly · 46 paymentsAll RDFI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 18, 2023 $0.11; Feb 2, 2023 $0.09; Mar 2, 2023 $0.10; Apr 4, 2023 $0.15; May 2, 2023 $0.15; Jun 2, 2023 $0.15; Jul 5, 2023 $0.15; Aug 2, 2023 $0.15; Sep 5, 2023 $0.15; Oct 3, 2023 $0.15; Nov 2, 2023 $0.15; Dec 4, 2023 $0.15; Jan 3, 2024 $0.16; Feb 2, 2024 $0.16; Mar 4, 2024 $0.16; Apr 2, 2024 $0.16; May 2, 2024 $0.16; Jun 4, 2024 $0.16; Jul 2, 2024 $0.16; Aug 2, 2024 $0.18; Sep 4, 2024 $0.16; Oct 2, 2024 $0.16; Nov 4, 2024 $0.16; Dec 3, 2024 $0.16; Jan 3, 2025 $0.18; Feb 4, 2025 $0.16; Mar 4, 2025 $0.16; Apr 2, 2025 $0.16; May 2, 2025 $0.16; Jun 3, 2025 $0.16; Jul 2, 2025 $0.16; Aug 4, 2025 $0.16; Sep 3, 2025 $0.16; Oct 2, 2025 $0.16; Nov 4, 2025 $0.16; Dec 2, 2025 $0.16; Jan 5, 2026 $0.16; Feb 3, 2026 $0.16; Mar 3, 2026 $0.16; Apr 2, 2026 $0.16; May 4, 2026 $0.16; Jun 2, 2026 $0.16; Jul 2, 2026 $0.16; Aug 4, 2026 $0.16; Sep 2, 2026 $0.16; Oct 2, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

CEFS vs RDFI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CEFS
  • RDFI
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: RDFI −23.5% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CEFS 11.5%RDFI 10.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CEFS 1.44, betterRDFI 0.66
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CEFS −16.8%, betterRDFI −23.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CEFS 0.78RDFI 1.49

Popular comparisons

  • CEFSBvsPCEFB

    Saba Opportunistic Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF · Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    2.61% · 2.71%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RDFIDvsPCEFB

    Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF · Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    4.23% · 2.71%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CEFSBvsYYYC

    Saba Opportunistic Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF · Amplify CEF High Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    2.61% · 3.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RDFIDvsYYYC

    Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF · Amplify CEF High Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    4.23% · 3.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CEFSBvsCEFZC

    Saba Opportunistic Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF · RiverNorth Active Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    2.61% · 2.82%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RDFIDvsCEFZC

    Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF · RiverNorth Active Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    4.23% · 2.82%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.