PCEF ranks 1st and YYY 3rd of 7 funds in the Closed-End Fund Portfolios Category.
PCEF vs YYY
PCEF −0.52pt a year
2.71%3.23%
YYY 3.7×the volume
123K451K
PCEF +2.1pt
+6.7%+4.6%
PCEF vs YYY Performance
+20.0%+9.9%
- PCEF 2.71%, better
- YYY 3.23%
- PCEF $743M
- YYY $672M
- PCEF +3.2%, better
- YYY −0.5%
- PCEF 7.78%
- YYY 13.98%, better
- PCEF 107
- YYY 61
- PCEF 123K sh
- YYY 451K sh, better
- PCEF $19.21
- YYY $10.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PCEF | YYY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65Higher | D31 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C46Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | B58 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A78 |
| Durability | A85Higher | A79 |
Rank among Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
Same Category. PCEF and YYY are both graded against the same 7 Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PCEFB
YYYC
In short
PCEF One ticker, roughly 110 closed-end funds. PCEF has tracked the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index since 2010, favoring CEFs priced below net asset value and paying out monthly. Cost: 2.71%, net of a waiver through August 31, 2027.
YYY A one-ticket basket of about 60 closed-end funds, screened for high yield, deep discounts to net asset value, and tradability, then reshuffled twice a year. Running since 2012, and it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
PCEF The Fund is based on the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index and normally invests at least 90% of total assets in funds included in that Index. It operates as a fund-of-funds, investing in those funds rather than individual securities.
YYY The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield of the Nasdaq CEF High Income Index. It generally invests in the closed-end funds included in that Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PCEF vs YYY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PCEF vs YYY Cost
Overpaying YYY vs PCEF
$4,910
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PCEF 2.71%
$40,863
YYY 3.23%
$45,773
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PCEF | YYY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $4,451 | $5,193 | $742 |
| 20 | $15,531 | $17,735 | $2,204 |
| 30 | $40,863 | $45,773 | $4,910 |
- 2.71%PCEF, cheaper
- 3.23%YYY
- Middle half of Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
- Median 3.19%
PCEF 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
YYY 5th cheapest of 7 funds
PCEF vs YYY Dividends
- PCEF 7.78%
- YYY 13.98%, better
- PCEF $1.49
- YYY $1.44
- PCEF $0.11
- YYY $0.12
- PCEF Oct 19, 2026
- YYY Oct 29, 2026
- PCEF Oct 23, 2026
- YYY Oct 30, 2026
- PCEF Monthly
- YYY Monthly
Distribution history
PCEF vs YYY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PCEF
- YYY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PCEF 10.0%, betterYYY 10.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- PCEF 0.99, betterYYY 0.75
- Worst fall
- PCEF −24.2%, betterYYY −27.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PCEF 1.04YYY 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 2.71% · 2.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.23% · 2.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.71% · 2.82%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.23% · 2.82%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.71% · 3.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.23% · 3.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.