Skip to content
etf.net

CGGO vs TAOZ

Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF

CGGOANYSE Arca

Thornburg American Opportunities Fund

TAOZCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

CGGO −0.32pt a year

CGGO0.47%TAOZ0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

CGGO 731.1×the volume

CGGO1.2MTAOZ1.64K

CGGO vs TAOZ Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.1%CGGO+0.8%TAOZ

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CGGO −5.1%. TAOZ +0.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%2%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CGGO 0.47%, better
TAOZ 0.79%
Fund size
CGGO $11.9B
TAOZ $488M
1Y total return
CGGO +8.6%
TAOZ No data
Yield (12M)
CGGO 1.06%
TAOZ No data
Holdings
CGGO 108
TAOZ 44
Avg volume (30D)
CGGO 1.2M sh, better
TAOZ 1.64K sh
NAV per share
CGGO $37.50
TAOZ $89.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CGGO: Cost 91, Risk 35, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 77, Durability 84. TAOZ: Cost 42, Risk 88, Mission not scored, Tradability 44, Holdings 45, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for CGGO, TAOZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCGGOTAOZ
Cost30% weightA91HigherC42
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD35A88Higher
Tradability15% weightB63HigherC44
Holdings10% weightA77HigherC45
Durability5% weightA84HigherB59

Rank among Global Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CGGO and TAOZ are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Active Growth⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

CGGO ranks 1st and TAOZ 3rd of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1ACGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETFScore 72
  2. Rank 2BWLTGWealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CTAOZThornburg American Opportunities FundScore 53
  4. Rank 4CBGGGBaillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CGGOACapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF

TAOZCThornburg American Opportunities Fund

In short

CGGO Capital Group's global stock-pickers, wrapped in an ETF: about 100 growth companies picked one at a time, at home and abroad, for 0.47% when the typical active rival in its group charges 0.85%.

TAOZ No data

Stated mandate

CGGO The fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in common stocks and cash or money market instruments. Its strategy emphasizes companies with significant growth potential using a bottom-up analysis.

TAOZ No data

Why people hold it

  • CGGO At 0.47%, the cheapest fund in its global-growth peer group and roughly half the 0.85% cohort median. Rivals like TMFG and PCGG sit at 0.85%; FFND is far higher.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so getting in and out is among the smoother experiences in this corner of the market.
  • Concentrated without being narrow: roughly 100 names, chosen bottom-up on company-level growth potential rather than sliced from an index.
  • Stands in the top quartile of its nine-fund active global growth cohort, one of the stronger implementations of the idea.

TAOZ No data

Worth knowing

  • CGGO Fully active and growth-tilted. There is no index backstop, and the ride tends to be bumpier than a broad-market fund.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, so this is built around capital growth rather than a regular income stream.
  • Launched in 2022, so the ETF's own record is short even though the manager is a long-established shop.

TAOZ No data

Full CGGO profile⁠

Full TAOZ profile⁠

CGGO vs TAOZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CGGO vs TAOZ Cost

Overpaying TAOZ vs CGGO

$5,756

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CGGO 0.47%

    $9,418

  • TAOZ 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CGGO 0.47%
  • TAOZ 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TAOZ $15,174CGGO $9,418

Year by year

YearCGGOTAOZOverpaying
10$847$1,405$558
20$3,261$5,331$2,070
30$9,418$15,174$5,756

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%CGGO, cheaper
  • 0.79%TAOZ
  • Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.79%

CGGO cheapest of 8 funds

TAOZ 4th cheapest of 8 funds

CGGO vs TAOZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CGGO 1.06%
TAOZ No data
Payout (12M)
CGGO $0.40
TAOZ None
Last payment
CGGO $0.40
TAOZ No data
Ex-dividend
CGGO Dec 26, 2025
TAOZ No data
Paid on
CGGO Dec 29, 2025
TAOZ No data
Frequency
CGGO Twice a year
TAOZ No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

CGGOTwice a year · 8 paymentsAll CGGO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 29, 2022 $0.04; Dec 23, 2022 $0.08; Jun 29, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.08; Jun 28, 2024 $0.20; Dec 26, 2024 $0.13; Jun 30, 2025 $0.30; Dec 26, 2025 $0.40. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
TAOZAll TAOZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CGGO vs TAOZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CGGO 15.7%TAOZ No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CGGO 0.95TAOZ No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CGGO −24.9%since Feb 2022TAOZ No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CGGO 1.14TAOZ 0.96

CGGO and TAOZ in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • CGGOAvsWLTGB

    Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF · WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TAOZCvsWLTGB

    Thornburg American Opportunities Fund · WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CGGOAvsBGGGC

    Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF · Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TAOZCvsBGGGC

    Thornburg American Opportunities Fund · Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CGGOAvsTMFGC

    Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF · Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TAOZCvsTMFGC

    Thornburg American Opportunities Fund · Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.