SCHZ ranks 2nd and CGIB 100th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
CGIB vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.42pt a year
0.45%0.03%
SCHZ 19.1×the volume
124K2.37M
CGIB vs SCHZ Performance
−0.4%−0.2%
- CGIB 0.45%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- CGIB $381M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- CGIB −0.4%
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- CGIB 1.56%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- CGIB 381
- SCHZ 12610
- CGIB 124K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- CGIB $25.11
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGIB | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B59Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | C41 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B56 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. CGIB and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGIBC
SCHZA
In short
CGIB Capital Group's active bond desk pointed overseas, with the currency layer hedged back to dollars. You get foreign bond selection without the euro and yen steering the outcome.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
CGIB The fund seeks a high level of current income while preserving capital, primarily through investments in bonds and other debt securities.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGIB vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGIB vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying CGIB vs SCHZ
$8,403
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGIB 0.45%
$9,041
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGIB | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $55 | $757 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $216 | $2,912 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $638 | $8,403 |
- 0.45%CGIB
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
CGIB 84th cheapest of 114 funds
CGIB vs SCHZ Dividends
- CGIB 1.56%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- CGIB $0.39
- SCHZ $0.96
- CGIB $0.03
- SCHZ $0.08
- CGIB Oct 30, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- CGIB Pays Nov 2, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- CGIB Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
CGIB vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGIB 3.1%SCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGIB −0.28SCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- CGIB −2.7%SCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CGIB 0.08SCHZ 0.99
CGIB and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
