DDM ranks 4th and CHAU 75th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
CHAU vs DDM
DDM −0.24pt a year
1.19%0.95%
DDM 2.2×the volume
85K185K
DDM +19.5pt
+0.1%+19.6%
CHAU vs DDM Performance
−51.7%+68.3%
- CHAU 1.19%
- DDM 0.95%, better
- CHAU $66M
- DDM $507M
- CHAU −18.6%
- DDM +14.5%, better
- CHAU 2.93%, better
- DDM 0.97%
- CHAU 10
- DDM 34
- CHAU 85K sh
- DDM 185K sh, better
- CHAU $16.31
- DDM $62.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CHAU | DDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | C51Higher |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | D39 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | B68 | A79Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. CHAU and DDM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CHAUD
DDMB
In short
CHAU Most leveraged funds point at US indexes. CHAU aims a 2x daily dial at the CSI 300, the blue-chip gauge of mainland China's A-share market, and has since 2015. Built for one trading day at a time.
DDM The Dow dates to 1896. DDM is the only ETF built to double its daily move: 2x the Dow Jones Industrial Average, reset every single day, for 0.95% a year, running since 2006.
Stated mandate
CHAU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the CSI 300 Index. Its objective applies to a single day rather than to longer cumulative periods.
DDM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CHAU vs DDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CHAU vs DDM Cost
Overpaying CHAU vs DDM
$3,828
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CHAU 1.19%
$21,697
DDM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CHAU | DDM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,081 | $1,678 | $403 |
| 20 | $7,756 | $6,322 | $1,434 |
| 30 | $21,697 | $17,869 | $3,828 |
- 1.19%CHAU
- 0.95%DDM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DDM 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
CHAU 86th cheapest of 95 funds
CHAU vs DDM Dividends
- CHAU 2.93%, better
- DDM 0.97%
- CHAU $0.48
- DDM $0.62
- CHAU $0.11
- DDM $0.15
- CHAU Sep 22, 2026
- DDM Sep 23, 2026
- CHAU Sep 29, 2026
- DDM Sep 29, 2026
- CHAU Quarterly
- DDM Quarterly
Distribution history
CHAU vs DDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CHAU
- DDM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CHAU 39.9%DDM 24.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CHAU 0.21DDM 0.96, better
- Worst fall
- CHAU −71.9%DDM −40.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CHAU 0.81DDM 1.73
Popular comparisons
- 1.19% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.19% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.19% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.