CHPS vs KMEM: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

CHPSANasdaq

Kurv Memory Select ETF

KMEMDCboe

Overlap

4.1%by weight

Expense ratio

CHPS −0.50pt a year

CHPS0.15%KMEM0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

KMEM 5.2×the volume

CHPS34.5KKMEM179K

CHPS vs KMEM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.7%CHPS−3.8%KMEM

Expense ratio: CHPS 0.15%, better; KMEM 0.65%
Fund size: CHPS $130M; KMEM $23M
1Y total return: CHPS +61.5%; KMEM No data
Yield (12M): CHPS 0.41%; KMEM No data
Holdings: CHPS 54; KMEM 10
Avg volume (30D): CHPS 34.5K sh; KMEM 179K sh, better
NAV per share: CHPS $75.55; KMEM $16.03
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for CHPS, KMEM, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	CHPS	KMEM
Cost30% weight	A100Higher	D38
Mission25% weight	A70	Not scored
Risk15% weight	B56Higher	F24
Tradability15% weight	C49Higher	C44
Holdings10% weight	A88Higher	D33
Durability5% weight	A70Higher	D37

Rank among Semiconductors funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. CHPS and KMEM are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Semiconductors⁠

Category · 25 funds

See all 25 ›

CHPS ranks 4th and KMEM 15th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.

Rank 1ASOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETFScore 82
Rank 2ASMHVanEck Semiconductor ETFScore 79
Rank 3ASOXXiShares Semiconductor ETFScore 78
Rank 4ACHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETFScore 77
Rank 5AXSDState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETFScore 71
Rank 13CSMHCVanEck China Semiconductor ETFScore 40
Rank 15DKMEMKurv Memory Select ETFScore 35
Rank 16DHBMXTuttle Capital Concentrated Memory Stack ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CHPSAXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

KMEMDKurv Memory Select ETF

In short

CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.

KMEM No data

Stated mandate

CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.

KMEM No data

Why people hold it

CHPS At 0.15%, one of the cheapest doors into chips. SMH and SOXX each charge more than double.
Global mandate, so foreign foundries and equipment makers are in scope, not just the US-listed marquee names.
The ESG screen sits inside the index itself: the chip universe gets filtered before the portfolio is built.
Simple plumbing. Roughly 50 holdings, one published index, cash paid out quarterly.

KMEM No data

Worth knowing

CHPS Trades thinly next to SMH and SOXX. Spreads can be wider, and size takes more care to get filled.
Launched in 2023, so the record is short against chip funds that have lived through several boom-bust cycles.
The screen excludes some chip companies outright, so the lineup can look different from unscreened rivals.

KMEM No data

Full CHPS profile⁠

Full KMEM profile⁠

CHPS vs KMEM Holdings

How CHPS and KMEM differ

Overlap by weight

4.1%

Shared holdings make up 21.9% of KMEM and 4.1% of CHPS.

Level by level

Holdings1 in both4.1%
Countryby domicile5.2%
Sector4 Sectors99.2%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CHPS and KMEM, widest gap first
Sector	More in CHPSMore in KMEM	CHPS	KMEM
Technology	KMEM +0.8 points	99.2%	100.0%
Industrials	CHPS +0.4 points	0.4%	0.0%
Energy	CHPS +0.4 points	0.4%	0.0%
Financials	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CHPS and KMEM, widest gap first
Country	More in CHPSMore in KMEM	CHPS	KMEM
South Korea	KMEM +94.8 points	5.2%	100.0%
United States	CHPS +62.5 points	62.5%	0.0%
Taiwan	CHPS +11.6 points	11.6%	0.0%
Japan	CHPS +10.4 points	10.4%	0.0%
Netherlands	CHPS +5.9 points	5.9%	0.0%
Germany	CHPS +1.6 points	1.6%	0.0%
China	CHPS +1.3 points	1.3%	0.0%
Singapore	CHPS +0.7 points	0.7%	0.0%
Other countries (2)	CHPS +0.8 points	0.8%	0.0%

Outside the US: CHPS 50% developed, 50% emerging. KMEM 0% developed, 100% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

CHPS47.4%
KMEM113.4%

Securities held

CHPS53
KMEM9

Asset class

CHPS: Equity
KMEM: Equity

Holdings

Only in CHPS52
In both1
Only in KMEM8

Only in CHPS

52 securities, 95.8% of CHPS by weight

NVIDIA Corp5.34%
Texas Instruments Inc5.31%
Advanced Micro Dev5.20%
Micron Technology4.97%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing4.95%
ASML Holding NV4.81%
Broadcom4.46%
Analog Devices Inc4.44%
MediaTek Inc3.86%
Lam Research Corp3.82%
Kla-Tencor Corp3.81%
QUALCOMM Inc3.80%
Marvell Technology Group Ltd3.76%
Applied Materials Inc3.64%
Advantest Corp3.50%
Intel Corp3.18%
Tokyo Electron Ltd2.98%
Kioxia Holdings Corp2.16%
ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd1.69%
Infineon Technologies AG1.61%
NXP Semiconductors NV1.44%
Te Connectivity Ltd1.37%
Monolithic Power Systems Inc1.26%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd1.08%
Teradyne Inc0.94%
Microchip Technology Inc0.90%
Coherent Corp0.90%
United Microelectronics Corp0.87%
ASM International NV0.83%
Astera Labs Inc0.76%
STMicroelectronics NV0.67%
Renesas Electronics Corp0.65%
ON Semiconductor Corp0.61%
Disco Corp0.60%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.55%
Entegris Inc0.52%
Arm Holdings PLC Ads0.45%
Nanya Technology Corp0.44%
Tower Semiconductor Ltd0.43%
VAT Group AG0.41%
Lasertec Corp0.41%
First Solar Inc0.40%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings0.33%
MKS Instruments Inc0.28%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp0.28%
BE Semiconductor Indstries NV0.27%
MPI Corporation0.26%
Fabrinet0.25%
Screen Holdings Co0.24%
Taiwan Semiconductor-Sp Adr0.08%

Only in KMEM

8 securities, 87.8% of KMEM by weight

United States Treasury Bill 06/10/202749.59%
United States Treasury Bill 12/24/202621.25%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd7.15%
United States Treasury Bill 03/18/20276.31%
Dram 12/18/2026 55 C2.08%
Mu 12/18/2026 930 C0.93%
Fidelity Inv Mmkt Govt-I 12/31/20310.35%
Sndk 12/18/2026 1570 C0.15%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CHPS and KMEM, widest gap first
Holding	More in CHPSMore in KMEM	CHPS	KMEM
SK Hynix Inc	KMEM +17.79 points	4.09%	21.88%

All 54 CHPS holdings⁠All 13 KMEM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CHPS vs KMEM Cost

Overpaying KMEM vs CHPS

$9,580

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

CHPS 0.15%
$3,137
KMEM 0.65%
$12,717

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

CHPS 0.15%
KMEM 0.65%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	CHPS	KMEM	Overpaying
10	$274	$1,163	$889
20	$1,071	$4,440	$3,369
30	$3,137	$12,717	$9,580

Expense ratio

0.15%CHPS, cheaper
0.65%KMEM

CHPS0.15%KMEM0.65%

0.15%1.00%

Middle half of Semiconductors funds
Median 0.60%

CHPS cheapest of 25 funds

KMEM 14th cheapest of 25 funds

CHPS vs KMEM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): CHPS 0.41%; KMEM No data
Payout (12M): CHPS $0.31; KMEM None
Last payment: CHPS $0.10; KMEM No data
Ex-dividend: CHPS Sep 18, 2026; KMEM No data
Paid on: CHPS Sep 25, 2026; KMEM No data
Frequency: CHPS Quarterly; KMEM No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CHPSQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll CHPS payments⁠

KMEMAll KMEM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CHPS vs KMEM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: CHPS 41.2%KMEM No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: CHPS 1.12KMEM No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: CHPS −39.4%since Jul 2023KMEM No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: CHPS 2.16KMEM 0.00; Market = 1

CHPS and KMEM in the news

All news⁠

ETF Filings
Direxion files for a memory ETF and two electricity-futures funds
Oct 16, 2026KMEM

Popular comparisons

CHPSAvsSOXQA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.19%
Category
KMEMDvsSOXQA
Kurv Memory Select ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.65% · 0.19%
Category
CHPSAvsSMHA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.35%
Category
KMEMDvsSMHA
Kurv Memory Select ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.65% · 0.35%
Category
CHPSAvsSOXXA
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.33%
Category
KMEMDvsSOXXA
Kurv Memory Select ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF
Expense ratio
0.65% · 0.33%
Category

CHPS vs KMEM

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How CHPS and KMEM differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in CHPS

Only in KMEM

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Direxion files for a memory ETF and two electricity-futures funds

How CHPS and KMEM differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in CHPS

Only in KMEM

Weight gaps