CIFG ranks 71st and GOGL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CIFG vs GOGL
0.0%by weight
GOGL −0.55pt a year
0.75%0.20%
CIFG 70.7×the volume
1.34M18.9K
CIFG vs GOGL Performance
−93.6%−42.4%
- CIFG 0.75%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- CIFG $7M
- GOGL $4M
- CIFG 5
- GOGL 1
- CIFG 1.34M sh, better
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- CIFG $0.6600
- GOGL $15.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIFG | GOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | F21 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B58Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C50Higher | D36 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CIFG and GOGL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIFGC
GOGLC
In short
CIFG Two-times daily exposure to Cipher Digital, the bitcoin miner building industrial-scale data centers. Same geared math as the rest of the aisle, at 0.75% a year, under the typical leveraged single-stock fee.
Stated mandate
CIFG The fund seeks daily returns equal to 200% of the daily performance of Cipher Digital stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIFG vs GOGL Holdings
How CIFG and GOGL differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CIFG and 0.0% of GOGL.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for CIFG and GOGL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- CIFG212.4%
- GOGL199.3%
- CIFG1
- GOGL0
Asset class
- CIFG
- Equity
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in CIFG1
- In both0
- Only in GOGL0
Only in CIFG
1 security, 12.2% of CIFG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204012.20%
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Weight gaps
CIFG and GOGL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIFG vs GOGL Cost
Overpaying CIFG vs GOGL
$10,327
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIFG 0.75%
$14,482
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIFG | GOGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $365 | $971 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $1,421 | $3,657 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $4,155 | $10,327 |
- 0.75%CIFG
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
CIFG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
CIFG vs GOGL Dividends
- CIFG None
- GOGL None
Distribution history
CIFG vs GOGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- CIFG 7.76GOGL −3.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.