OKTG ranks 3rd and CIFU 295th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CIFU vs OKTG
OKTG −0.75pt a year
1.50%0.75%
CIFU 34.8×the volume
1.34M38.5K
CIFU vs OKTG Performance
−92.7%+247.6%
- CIFU 1.50%
- OKTG 0.75%, better
- CIFU $15M
- OKTG $8M
- CIFU 3
- OKTG 5
- CIFU 1.34M sh, better
- OKTG 38.5K sh
- CIFU $2.02
- OKTG $53.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIFU | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D25 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CIFU and OKTG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIFUD
OKTGA
In short
CIFU Two times Cipher Mining's daily move in a single ticker, no margin account involved. A geared play on a US bitcoin miner turned data-center builder, rebuilt fresh every trading day, which makes it a short-leash trading tool.
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
CIFU The fund seeks daily investment results corresponding to two times the performance of CIFR, before fees and expenses.
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIFU vs OKTG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIFU vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying CIFU vs OKTG
$11,801
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIFU 1.50%
$26,283
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIFU | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,336 | $1,254 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,078 | $4,441 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,482 | $11,801 |
- 1.50%CIFU
- 0.75%OKTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
OKTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
CIFU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
CIFU vs OKTG Dividends
- CIFU None
- OKTG None
Distribution history
CIFU vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- CIFU 8.23OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.