TSMG ranks 1st and CIFU 295th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CIFU vs TSMG
TSMG −0.74pt a year
1.50%0.76%
CIFU 19.4×the volume
1.34M69K
CIFU vs TSMG Performance
−92.7%+41.5%
- CIFU 1.50%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- CIFU $15M
- TSMG $28M
- CIFU
- TSMG +40.8%
- CIFU 3
- TSMG 5
- CIFU 1.34M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- CIFU $2.02
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIFU | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A89Higher | A79 |
| Risk | D25 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CIFU and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIFUD
TSMGA
In short
CIFU Two times Cipher Mining's daily move in a single ticker, no margin account involved. A geared play on a US bitcoin miner turned data-center builder, rebuilt fresh every trading day, which makes it a short-leash trading tool.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
CIFU The fund seeks daily investment results corresponding to two times the performance of CIFR, before fees and expenses.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIFU vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIFU vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying CIFU vs TSMG
$11,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIFU 1.50%
$26,283
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIFU | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,353 | $1,237 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,142 | $4,377 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,656 | $11,627 |
- 1.50%CIFU
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CIFU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
CIFU vs TSMG Dividends
- CIFU None
- TSMG
- CIFU
- TSMG $2.73
- CIFU
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- CIFU
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- CIFU
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
CIFU vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CIFU TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CIFU TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- CIFU TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CIFU 8.23TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.