PANG ranks 3rd and CIFU 295th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CIFU vs PANG
PANG −0.74pt a year
1.50%0.76%
CIFU 30.0×the volume
1.34M44.6K
CIFU vs PANG Performance
−93.5%+160.8%
- CIFU 1.50%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- CIFU $13M
- PANG $9M
- CIFU
- PANG +76.3%
- CIFU 3
- PANG 4
- CIFU 1.34M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- CIFU $1.62
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIFU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D25 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CIFU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIFUD
PANGA
In short
CIFU Two times Cipher Mining's daily move in a single ticker, no margin account involved. A geared play on a US bitcoin miner turned data-center builder, rebuilt fresh every trading day, which makes it a short-leash trading tool.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
CIFU The fund seeks daily investment results corresponding to two times the performance of CIFR, before fees and expenses.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIFU vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIFU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying CIFU vs PANG
$11,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIFU 1.50%
$26,283
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIFU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,353 | $1,237 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,142 | $4,377 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,656 | $11,627 |
- 1.50%CIFU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
CIFU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
CIFU vs PANG Dividends
- CIFU None
- PANG
- CIFU
- PANG $1.30
- CIFU
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- CIFU
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- CIFU
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
CIFU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CIFU PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CIFU PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CIFU PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CIFU 8.23PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.