UNHG ranks 2nd and CIFU 295th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
CIFU vs UNHG
UNHG −0.73pt a year
1.50%0.77%
CIFU 1.8×the volume
1.34M726K
CIFU vs UNHG Performance
−92.7%+22.2%
- CIFU 1.50%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- CIFU $15M
- UNHG $63M
- CIFU
- UNHG +11.9%
- CIFU 3
- UNHG 5
- CIFU 1.34M sh, better
- UNHG 726K sh
- CIFU $2.02
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CIFU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A90Higher |
| Risk | D25 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. CIFU and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CIFUD
UNHGA
In short
CIFU Two times Cipher Mining's daily move in a single ticker, no margin account involved. A geared play on a US bitcoin miner turned data-center builder, rebuilt fresh every trading day, which makes it a short-leash trading tool.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
CIFU The fund seeks daily investment results corresponding to two times the performance of CIFR, before fees and expenses.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CIFU vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CIFU vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying CIFU vs UNHG
$11,454
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CIFU 1.50%
$26,283
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CIFU | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $1,371 | $1,219 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $5,205 | $4,314 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $14,829 | $11,454 |
- 1.50%CIFU
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
CIFU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
CIFU vs UNHG Dividends
- CIFU None
- UNHG
- CIFU
- UNHG $1.90
- CIFU
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- CIFU
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- CIFU
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
CIFU vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CIFU UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CIFU UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- CIFU UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CIFU 8.23UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.