Skip to content
etf.net

CLCG vs GUSE

Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF

CLCGCNYSE Arca

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.20pt a year

CLCG0.50%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 10.4×the volume

CLCG2.39KGUSE24.9K

CLCG vs GUSE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.5%CLCG+11.8%GUSE

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CLCG +0.5%. GUSE +11.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CLCG 0.50%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
CLCG $27M
GUSE $421M
1Y total return
CLCG −2.1%
GUSE No data
Holdings
CLCG 34
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
CLCG 2.39K sh
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
NAV per share
CLCG $27.14
GUSE $46.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CLCG: Cost 62, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 14, Holdings 40, Durability 19. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for CLCG, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCLCGGUSE
Cost30% weightB62A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37A94Higher
Tradability15% weightF14C46Higher
Holdings10% weightC40A89Higher
Durability5% weightF19A85Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CLCG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and CLCG 60th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 59CGARYMango Growth ETFScore 43
  5. Rank 60CCLCGCrossmark Large Cap Growth ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 60CJXXJanus Henderson Transformational Growth ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CLCGCCrossmark Large Cap Growth ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

CLCG No data

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

CLCG No data

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

CLCG No data

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

CLCG No data

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full CLCG profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

CLCG vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CLCG vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying CLCG vs GUSE

$3,830

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CLCG 0.50%

    $9,979

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CLCG 0.50%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530CLCG $9,979GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearCLCGGUSEOverpaying
10$900$545$355
20$3,460$2,113$1,347
30$9,979$6,149$3,830

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%CLCG
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

CLCG 33rd cheapest of 90 funds

CLCG vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
CLCG $0.02
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
CLCG Dec 18, 2025
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
CLCG No data
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
CLCG Irregular
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

CLCGIrregular · 1 paymentAll CLCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

CLCG vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CLCG 17.9%since Aug 2025GUSE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CLCG 0.20since Aug 2025GUSE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CLCG −16.3%since Jul 2025GUSE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CLCG 1.28GUSE 0.93

Popular comparisons

  • CLCGCvsJUSAA

    Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CLCGCvsLRGCA

    Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CLCGCvsFELGA

    Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.