CMDY ranks 3rd and GCC 9th of 22 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.
CMDY vs GCC
CMDY −0.28pt a year
0.29%0.57%
GCC 1.1×the volume
90.3K100K
GCC +1.9pt
+8.7%+10.6%
CMDY vs GCC Performance
+51.6%+65.4%
- CMDY 0.29%, better
- GCC 0.57%
- CMDY $713M
- GCC $208M
- CMDY +26.2%, better
- GCC +23.3%
- CMDY 10.47%
- GCC 35.85%, better
- CMDY 99
- GCC 17
- CMDY 90.3K sh
- GCC 100K sh, better
- CMDY $60.42
- GCC $19.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMDY | GCC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | B61 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | C50 | B55Higher |
| Holdings | A83Higher | D35 |
| Durability | B68Higher | C49 |
Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CMDY and GCC are both graded against the same 22 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMDYB
GCCC
In short
CMDY Commodities without the worst of the futures math. CMDY tracks the Roll Select version of the Bloomberg commodity index, where contract choice is written into the rules to ease rolling costs, and charges 0.29% to do it.
GCC A broad commodity basket with a trader's touch: energy, agriculture, industrial metals and precious metals, actively rolled along the futures curve, plus prospectus room for a small bitcoin futures sleeve.
Stated mandate
CMDY The fund seeks to track an index representing a broad range of commodity exposures, using enhanced roll selection on a total-return basis.
GCC The fund is actively managed and seeks broad commodity exposure across energy, agriculture, industrial metals, and precious metals, primarily through futures contracts.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMDY vs GCC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMDY vs GCC Cost
Overpaying GCC vs CMDY
$5,319
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMDY 0.29%
$5,952
GCC 0.57%
$11,271
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMDY | GCC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $1,023 | $496 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $3,921 | $1,877 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $11,271 | $5,319 |
- 0.29%CMDY, cheaper
- 0.57%GCC
- Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.67%
CMDY 5th cheapest of 22 funds
GCC 10th cheapest of 22 funds
CMDY vs GCC Dividends
- CMDY 10.47%
- GCC 35.85%, better
- CMDY $6.29
- GCC $6.77
- CMDY $6.29
- GCC $6.45
- CMDY Dec 16, 2025
- GCC Oct 27, 2026
- CMDY Dec 19, 2025
- GCC Oct 29, 2026
- CMDY Annual
- GCC Annual
Distribution history
CMDY vs GCC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CMDY
- GCC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMDY 13.1%GCC 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CMDY 0.79GCC 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- CMDY −26.6%, betterGCC −27.2%
- Market sensitivity
- CMDY 0.90GCC 0.65
CMDY and GCC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
