GXC ranks 4th and CNQQ 26th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CNQQ vs GXC
GXC −0.16pt a year
0.75%0.59%
GXC 2.0×the volume
11.5K23.4K
CNQQ vs GXC Performance
−24.2%−18.4%
- CNQQ 0.75%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- CNQQ $44M
- GXC $421M
- CNQQ −24.2%
- GXC −18.4%, better
- CNQQ
- GXC 2.44%
- CNQQ 100
- GXC 1539
- CNQQ 11.5K sh
- GXC 23.4K sh, better
- CNQQ $18.20
- GXC $80.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNQQ | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D28 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | C42 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | A76Higher |
| Durability | D38 | A84Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CNQQ and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNQQD
GXCA
In short
CNQQ A thematic slice of China tech instead of the whole market: CNQQ tracks a Solactive index built with ChinaAMC around companies driving China's tech transformation, across mainland China and Hong Kong.
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
Stated mandate
CNQQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech Index.
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNQQ vs GXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNQQ vs GXC Cost
Overpaying CNQQ vs GXC
$2,847
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNQQ 0.75%
$14,482
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNQQ | GXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,058 | $278 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $4,051 | $1,027 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $11,635 | $2,847 |
- 0.75%CNQQ
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CNQQ 21st cheapest of 28 funds
CNQQ vs GXC Dividends
- CNQQ
- GXC 2.44%
- CNQQ
- GXC $1.99
- CNQQ $0.0033
- GXC $0.67
- CNQQ Sep 29, 2026
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- CNQQ Oct 1, 2026
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- CNQQ Irregular
- GXC Twice a year
Distribution history
CNQQ vs GXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNQQ 24.9%GXC 20.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- CNQQ −1.27GXC 0.27
- Worst fall
- CNQQ −32.1%GXC −46.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CNQQ 1.02GXC 0.69
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.