CXSE ranks 1st and CNQQ 26th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CNQQ vs CXSE
CXSE −0.43pt a year
0.75%0.32%
CXSE 3.2×the volume
11.5K37.2K
CNQQ vs CXSE Performance
−24.2%−24.1%
- CNQQ 0.75%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- CNQQ $44M
- CXSE $372M
- CNQQ −24.2%
- CXSE −24.1%, better
- CNQQ
- CXSE 2.20%
- CNQQ 100
- CXSE 241
- CNQQ 11.5K sh
- CXSE 37.2K sh, better
- CNQQ $18.20
- CXSE $31.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNQQ | CXSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D28 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C42 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | A74Higher |
| Durability | D38 | A79Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CNQQ and CXSE are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNQQD
CXSEA
In short
CNQQ A thematic slice of China tech instead of the whole market: CNQQ tracks a Solactive index built with ChinaAMC around companies driving China's tech transformation, across mainland China and Hong Kong.
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
Stated mandate
CNQQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech Index.
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNQQ vs CXSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNQQ vs CXSE Cost
Overpaying CNQQ vs CXSE
$7,940
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNQQ 0.75%
$14,482
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNQQ | CXSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $580 | $756 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $2,250 | $2,828 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $6,542 | $7,940 |
- 0.75%CNQQ
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
CNQQ 21st cheapest of 28 funds
CNQQ vs CXSE Dividends
- CNQQ
- CXSE 2.20%
- CNQQ
- CXSE $0.69
- CNQQ $0.0033
- CXSE $0.26
- CNQQ Sep 29, 2026
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- CNQQ Oct 1, 2026
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- CNQQ Irregular
- CXSE Quarterly
Distribution history
CNQQ vs CXSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNQQ 24.9%CXSE 24.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- CNQQ −1.27CXSE 0.12
- Worst fall
- CNQQ −32.1%CXSE −57.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CNQQ 1.02CXSE 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.