GXC ranks 4th and CNXT 13th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CNXT vs GXC
GXC −0.06pt a year
0.65%0.59%
CNXT 3.7×the volume
86.5K23.4K
GXC +0.8pt
+1.8%+2.6%
CNXT vs GXC Performance
−28.1%−18.2%
- CNXT 0.65%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- CNXT $63M
- GXC $421M
- CNXT −19.0%, better
- GXC −19.1%
- CNXT 0.23%
- GXC 2.46%, better
- CNXT 98
- GXC 1539
- CNXT 86.5K sh, better
- GXC 23.4K sh
- CNXT $34.80
- GXC $80.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNXT | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A78Higher |
| Mission | B59 | A85Higher |
| Risk | D33 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A84Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CNXT and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNXTC
GXCA
In short
CNXT A pure Shenzhen play: CNXT tracks the ChiNext Index, the large and liquid companies on Shenzhen's ChiNext growth board, and has run that one mandate since 2014.
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
Stated mandate
CNXT CNXT seeks to track the price and yield performance of the ChiNext Index, which represents large and liquid companies listed on Shenzhen's ChiNext Market.
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNXT vs GXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNXT vs GXC Cost
Overpaying CNXT vs GXC
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNXT 0.65%
$12,717
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNXT | GXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,058 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,051 | $389 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $11,635 | $1,082 |
- 0.65%CNXT
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CNXT 11th cheapest of 28 funds
CNXT vs GXC Dividends
- CNXT 0.23%
- GXC 2.46%, better
- CNXT $0.08
- GXC $1.99
- CNXT $0.08
- GXC $0.67
- CNXT Dec 22, 2025
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- CNXT Dec 26, 2025
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- CNXT Annual
- GXC Twice a year
Distribution history
CNXT vs GXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CNXT
- GXC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNXT 42.0%GXC 20.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CNXT 0.36, betterGXC 0.27
- Worst fall
- CNXT −61.1%GXC −46.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CNXT 0.77GXC 0.69
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.