CXSE ranks 1st and CNXT 13th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CNXT vs CXSE
CXSE −0.33pt a year
0.65%0.32%
CNXT 2.3×the volume
86.5K37.2K
CXSE +1.3pt
+1.8%+3.1%
CNXT vs CXSE Performance
−28.1%−39.0%
- CNXT 0.65%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- CNXT $63M
- CXSE $372M
- CNXT −19.0%, better
- CXSE −24.9%
- CNXT 0.23%
- CXSE 2.22%, better
- CNXT 98
- CXSE 241
- CNXT 86.5K sh, better
- CXSE 37.2K sh
- CNXT $34.80
- CXSE $31.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNXT | CXSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A97Higher |
| Mission | B59 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D33 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | C44 | A74Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A79Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CNXT and CXSE are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNXTC
CXSEA
In short
CNXT A pure Shenzhen play: CNXT tracks the ChiNext Index, the large and liquid companies on Shenzhen's ChiNext growth board, and has run that one mandate since 2014.
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
Stated mandate
CNXT CNXT seeks to track the price and yield performance of the ChiNext Index, which represents large and liquid companies listed on Shenzhen's ChiNext Market.
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNXT vs CXSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNXT vs CXSE Cost
Overpaying CNXT vs CXSE
$6,175
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNXT 0.65%
$12,717
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNXT | CXSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $580 | $583 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,250 | $2,190 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $6,542 | $6,175 |
- 0.65%CNXT
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
CNXT 11th cheapest of 28 funds
CNXT vs CXSE Dividends
- CNXT 0.23%
- CXSE 2.22%, better
- CNXT $0.08
- CXSE $0.69
- CNXT $0.08
- CXSE $0.26
- CNXT Dec 22, 2025
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- CNXT Dec 26, 2025
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- CNXT Annual
- CXSE Quarterly
Distribution history
CNXT vs CXSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CNXT
- CXSE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNXT 42.0%CXSE 24.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CNXT 0.36, betterCXSE 0.12
- Worst fall
- CNXT −61.1%CXSE −57.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CNXT 0.77CXSE 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.