COMB ranks 3rd and NBCM 12th of 21 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.
COMB vs NBCM
COMB −0.51pt a year
0.25%0.76%
NBCM 2.3×the volume
39.2K89.5K
NBCM +3.5pt
+14.8%+18.3%
COMB vs NBCM Performance
+35.3%+40.8%
- COMB 0.25%, better
- NBCM 0.76%
- COMB $159M
- NBCM $577M
- COMB +35.3%
- NBCM +40.8%, better
- COMB 6.88%, better
- NBCM 6.14%
- COMB 28
- NBCM 205
- COMB 39.2K sh
- NBCM 89.5K sh, better
- COMB $27.90
- NBCM $31.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COMB | NBCM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | D32 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | C48Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A81 | |
| Durability | D30 | C42Higher |
Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. COMB and NBCM are both graded against the same 21 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COMBA
NBCMC
In short
COMB The cheapest ticket in the K-1-free commodity aisle: 0.25% for a broad basket of energy, metals, grain and livestock futures, wrapped so your tax packet is a Form 1099 instead of a Schedule K-1.
NBCM Most broad commodity funds just track an index and rebalance on schedule. NBCM runs quantitative models to shift weights across commodity sectors, backed by a fixed-income collateral sleeve. Active management in a mostly passive aisle.
Stated mandate
COMB The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation mainly through exposure to commodity futures markets.
NBCM The Fund seeks commodity exposure through commodity-linked derivatives and fixed-income instruments. It uses quantitative models to identify opportunities and set portfolio weights across multiple commodity sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COMB vs NBCM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COMB vs NBCM Cost
Overpaying NBCM vs COMB
$9,497
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COMB 0.25%
$5,159
NBCM 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COMB | NBCM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $1,353 | $898 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $5,142 | $3,373 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $14,656 | $9,497 |
- 0.25%COMB, cheaper
- 0.76%NBCM
- Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.68%
COMB 2nd cheapest of 21 funds
NBCM 14th cheapest of 21 funds
COMB vs NBCM Dividends
- COMB 6.88%, better
- NBCM 6.14%
- COMB $1.91
- NBCM $1.91
- COMB $1.91
- NBCM $1.91
- COMB Dec 29, 2025
- NBCM Dec 19, 2025
- COMB Dec 31, 2025
- NBCM Dec 24, 2025
- COMB Annual
- NBCM Annual
Distribution history
COMB vs NBCM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COMB 14.2%NBCM 13.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- COMB 0.73NBCM 0.99, better
- Worst fall
- COMB −26.5%NBCM −14.8%
- Market sensitivity
- COMB 1.00NBCM 0.93
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.