CMDY ranks 2nd and NBCM 12th of 21 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.
CMDY vs NBCM
CMDY −0.47pt a year
0.29%0.76%
CMDY 1.01×the volume
90.8K89.5K
NBCM +3.4pt
+14.9%+18.3%
CMDY vs NBCM Performance
+32.5%+40.8%
- CMDY 0.29%, better
- NBCM 0.76%
- CMDY $743M
- NBCM $577M
- CMDY +32.5%
- NBCM +40.8%, better
- CMDY 9.96%, better
- NBCM 6.14%
- CMDY 108
- NBCM 205
- CMDY 90.8K sh, better
- NBCM 89.5K sh
- CMDY $63.21
- NBCM $31.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMDY | NBCM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | D32 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | C47 |
| Holdings | A85Higher | A81 |
| Durability | B67Higher | C42 |
Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CMDY and NBCM are both graded against the same 21 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMDYA
NBCMC
In short
CMDY Commodities without the worst of the futures math. CMDY tracks the Roll Select version of the Bloomberg commodity index, where contract choice is written into the rules to ease rolling costs, and charges 0.29% to do it.
NBCM Most broad commodity funds just track an index and rebalance on schedule. NBCM runs quantitative models to shift weights across commodity sectors, backed by a fixed-income collateral sleeve. Active management in a mostly passive aisle.
Stated mandate
CMDY The fund seeks to track an index representing a broad range of commodity exposures, using enhanced roll selection on a total-return basis.
NBCM The Fund seeks commodity exposure through commodity-linked derivatives and fixed-income instruments. It uses quantitative models to identify opportunities and set portfolio weights across multiple commodity sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMDY vs NBCM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMDY vs NBCM Cost
Overpaying NBCM vs CMDY
$8,704
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMDY 0.29%
$5,952
NBCM 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMDY | NBCM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $1,353 | $826 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $5,142 | $3,098 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $14,656 | $8,704 |
- 0.29%CMDY, cheaper
- 0.76%NBCM
- Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.68%
CMDY 4th cheapest of 21 funds
NBCM 14th cheapest of 21 funds
CMDY vs NBCM Dividends
- CMDY 9.96%, better
- NBCM 6.14%
- CMDY $6.29
- NBCM $1.91
- CMDY $6.29
- NBCM $1.91
- CMDY Dec 16, 2025
- NBCM Dec 19, 2025
- CMDY Dec 19, 2025
- NBCM Dec 24, 2025
- CMDY Annual
- NBCM Annual
Distribution history
CMDY vs NBCM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMDY 13.1%, betterNBCM 13.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CMDY 0.79NBCM 0.99, better
- Worst fall
- CMDY −26.6%NBCM −14.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CMDY 0.90NBCM 0.93
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.