CERY ranks 1st and NBCM 12th of 21 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.
CERY vs NBCM
CERY −0.48pt a year
0.28%0.76%
CERY 2.4×the volume
216K89.5K
CERY vs NBCM Performance
+43.1%+40.8%
- CERY 0.28%, better
- NBCM 0.76%
- CERY $1.27B
- NBCM $577M
- CERY +43.1%, better
- NBCM +40.8%
- CERY 3.59%
- NBCM 6.14%, better
- CERY 12
- NBCM 205
- CERY 216K sh, better
- NBCM 89.5K sh
- CERY $39.89
- NBCM $31.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CERY | NBCM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | D32 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A81 | |
| Durability | B64Higher | C42 |
Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CERY and NBCM are both graded against the same 21 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CERYA
NBCMC
In short
CERY Broad commodity exposure without the K-1 envelope. CERY tracks Bloomberg's Enhanced Roll Yield index, a rules-based long-only basket held through synthetic futures, and charges 0.28% in a category where the typical fee is far higher.
NBCM Most broad commodity funds just track an index and rebalance on schedule. NBCM runs quantitative models to shift weights across commodity sectors, backed by a fixed-income collateral sleeve. Active management in a mostly passive aisle.
Stated mandate
CERY The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index, which represents diversified, long-only exposure to broad commodities through synthetic futures positions.
NBCM The Fund seeks commodity exposure through commodity-linked derivatives and fixed-income instruments. It uses quantitative models to identify opportunities and set portfolio weights across multiple commodity sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CERY vs NBCM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CERY vs NBCM Cost
Overpaying NBCM vs CERY
$8,901
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CERY 0.28%
$5,755
NBCM 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CERY | NBCM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $1,353 | $844 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $5,142 | $3,166 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $14,656 | $8,901 |
- 0.28%CERY, cheaper
- 0.76%NBCM
- Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.68%
CERY 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
NBCM 14th cheapest of 21 funds
CERY vs NBCM Dividends
- CERY 3.59%
- NBCM 6.14%, better
- CERY $1.43
- NBCM $1.91
- CERY $1.43
- NBCM $1.91
- CERY Dec 29, 2025
- NBCM Dec 19, 2025
- CERY Dec 31, 2025
- NBCM Dec 24, 2025
- CERY Annual
- NBCM Annual
Distribution history
CERY vs NBCM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CERY 14.0%NBCM 13.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CERY 1.41NBCM 0.99
- Worst fall
- CERY −14.3%NBCM −14.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CERY 0.03NBCM 0.93
CERY and NBCM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

