QLD ranks 1st and COPZ 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
COPZ vs QLD
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.95%0.89%
QLD 177.8×the volume
23.3K4.15M
COPZ vs QLD Performance
−21.4%−4.0%
- COPZ 0.95%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- COPZ $5M
- QLD $13.3B
- COPZ
- QLD +7.6%
- COPZ
- QLD 0.15%
- COPZ 7
- QLD 113
- COPZ 23.3K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- COPZ $10.73
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COPZ | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A95 |
| Risk | F24 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | C42 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. COPZ and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COPZC
QLDA
In short
COPZ Copper miners, doubled. This fund aims to deliver twice the daily move of a global copper-miner stock basket, resetting each session. Its own documents call it a short-term, actively monitored tool, not a park-it holding.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
COPZ The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change in the share price of COPX, before fees and expenses. It is intended for short-term, actively monitored use rather than periods longer than one trading day.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COPZ vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COPZ vs QLD Cost
Overpaying COPZ vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COPZ 0.95%
$17,869
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COPZ | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,576 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $5,953 | $369 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $16,872 | $997 |
- 0.95%COPZ
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
COPZ 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
COPZ vs QLD Dividends
- COPZ
- QLD 0.15%
- COPZ None
- QLD $0.12
- COPZ
- QLD $0.03
- COPZ
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- COPZ
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- COPZ
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
COPZ vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COPZ QLD 36.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- COPZ QLD 1.04
- Worst fall
- COPZ QLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- COPZ 3.51QLD 2.46
COPZ and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

