COTG ranks 3rd and MUU 46th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs MUU
0.0%by weight
COTG −0.24pt a year
0.77%1.01%
MUU 342.0×the volume
97.2K33.2M
COTG vs MUU Performance
+16.3%+311.7%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- MUU 1.01%
- COTG $9M
- MUU $1.55B
- COTG +16.3%
- MUU +311.7%, better
- COTG
- MUU 3.48%
- COTG 4
- MUU 11
- COTG 97.2K sh
- MUU 33.2M sh, better
- COTG $15.32
- MUU $13.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | MUU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A95Higher | A90 |
| Risk | A86Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56 | A86Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and MUU are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGA
MUUB
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
MUU Two ETFs offer 2x daily Micron. MUU is the cheaper one, and the one that actually trades. The mandate is 200% of Micron's daily share move before fees, with the leverage clock reset every morning.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
MUU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Micron Technology, Inc.’s common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs MUU Holdings
How COTG and MUU differ
0.0%
About this figure: COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
MUU gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for COTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in COTGMore in MUU | Gap | COTG | MUU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- COTG212.3%
- MUU98.8%
- COTG1
- MUU2
Asset class
- COTG
- Stocks
- MUU
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in COTG1
- In both0
- Only in MUU2
Only in COTG
1 security, 12.4% of COTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204012.36%
Only in MUU
2 securities, 20.9% of MUU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50614.44%
- Micron Technology Inc6.46%
Weight gaps
COTG and MUU share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs MUU Cost
Overpaying MUU vs COTG
$4,021
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
MUU 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | MUU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,780 | $409 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $6,686 | $1,481 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $18,850 | $4,021 |
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- 1.01%MUU
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
MUU 198th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG vs MUU Dividends
- COTG
- MUU 3.48%
- COTG None
- MUU $0.54
- COTG
- MUU $0.20
- COTG
- MUU Sep 22, 2026
- COTG
- MUU Sep 29, 2026
- COTG
- MUU Quarterly
Distribution history
COTG vs MUU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%MUU 216.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12MUU 1.44
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%MUU −79.4%
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04MUU 7.80
COTG and MUU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
