CPRO ranks 2nd and KBUF 15th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
CPRO vs KBUF
CPRO −0.28pt a year
0.69%0.97%
CPRO 1.1×the volume
5.02K4.52K
CPRO vs KBUF Performance
+7.3%−20.0%
- CPRO 0.69%, better
- KBUF 0.97%
- CPRO $27M
- KBUF $6M
- CPRO +7.3%, better
- KBUF −20.0%
- CPRO
- KBUF 9.14%
- CPRO 3
- KBUF 3
- CPRO 5.02K sh, better
- KBUF 4.52K sh
- CPRO $28.89
- KBUF $25.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CPRO | KBUF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A88 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | D38 | |
| Durability | B63Higher | B61 |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. CPRO and KBUF are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CPROA
KBUFF
In short
CPRO Small-cap exposure without small-cap drawdowns: CPRO tracks the Russell 2000 and aims to shield 100% of capital across each one-year outcome period, trading away upside above a preset cap.
KBUF Buffer ETFs almost always wrap a US index. This one wraps KWEB, KraneShares' China internet basket, with a 90% protection level running to January 2027. A wild reference asset, put inside defined guardrails.
Stated mandate
CPRO The ETF seeks to provide Russell 2000 exposure with defined upside participation while protecting 100% of capital from losses over the one-year outcome period.
KBUF The fund seeks to track the price return of KWEB during a defined outcome period, subject to a 40.01% cap and a 90% downside buffer.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CPRO vs KBUF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CPRO vs KBUF Cost
Overpaying KBUF vs CPRO
$4,769
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CPRO 0.69%
$13,429
KBUF 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CPRO | KBUF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,712 | $480 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $6,443 | $1,746 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $18,198 | $4,769 |
- 0.69%CPRO, cheaper
- 0.97%KBUF
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
CPRO 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
KBUF 16th cheapest of 18 funds
CPRO vs KBUF Dividends
- CPRO
- KBUF 9.14%
- CPRO None
- KBUF $2.30
- CPRO
- KBUF $2.30
- CPRO
- KBUF Dec 30, 2025
- CPRO
- KBUF Dec 31, 2025
- CPRO
- KBUF Irregular
Distribution history
CPRO vs KBUF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CPRO 3.8%KBUF 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CPRO 0.94KBUF 0.02
- Worst fall
- CPRO −3.3%KBUF −22.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CPRO 0.21KBUF 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.