CPNS ranks 4th and KBUF 15th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.
CPNS vs KBUF
CPNS −0.28pt a year
0.69%0.97%
CPNS 1.5×the volume
6.93K4.52K
CPNS vs KBUF Performance
+4.5%−20.0%
- CPNS 0.69%, better
- KBUF 0.97%
- CPNS $28M
- KBUF $6M
- CPNS +4.5%, better
- KBUF −20.0%
- CPNS
- KBUF 9.14%
- CPNS 3
- KBUF 3
- CPNS 6.93K sh, better
- KBUF 4.52K sh
- CPNS $28.44
- KBUF $25.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CPNS | KBUF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A91 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | D38 | |
| Durability | B60 | B61Higher |
Rank among Other Floor Protected funds
Same Category. CPNS and KBUF are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CPNSA
KBUFF
In short
CPNS Armor, not a cushion. CPNS uses options on the Nasdaq-100 to target 100% protection from losses over a one-year outcome period, before fees, and pays for that shield with a hard cap on the upside that resets every September.
KBUF Buffer ETFs almost always wrap a US index. This one wraps KWEB, KraneShares' China internet basket, with a 90% protection level running to January 2027. A wild reference asset, put inside defined guardrails.
Stated mandate
CPNS Seeks to provide positive price-return participation in the Nasdaq-100 up to a predetermined cap while protecting 100% of losses over the one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.
KBUF The fund seeks to track the price return of KWEB during a defined outcome period, subject to a 40.01% cap and a 90% downside buffer.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CPNS vs KBUF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CPNS vs KBUF Cost
Overpaying KBUF vs CPNS
$4,769
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CPNS 0.69%
$13,429
KBUF 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CPNS | KBUF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,712 | $480 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $6,443 | $1,746 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $18,198 | $4,769 |
- 0.69%CPNS, cheaper
- 0.97%KBUF
- Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
- Median 0.79%
CPNS 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
KBUF 16th cheapest of 18 funds
CPNS vs KBUF Dividends
- CPNS
- KBUF 9.14%
- CPNS None
- KBUF $2.30
- CPNS
- KBUF $2.30
- CPNS
- KBUF Dec 30, 2025
- CPNS
- KBUF Dec 31, 2025
- CPNS
- KBUF Irregular
Distribution history
CPNS vs KBUF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CPNS 2.9%KBUF 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CPNS 0.67KBUF 0.02
- Worst fall
- CPNS −4.0%KBUF −22.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CPNS 0.21KBUF 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.