Skip to content

CQTM vs EUV

Corgi Quantum Computing ETF

CQTMBCboe

Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

EUVACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

CQTM0.35%EUV0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

EUV 42.9×the volume

CQTM21.3KEUV913K

CQTM vs EUV Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−23.5%CQTM−12.1%EUV

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CQTM −23.5%. EUV −12.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CQTM 0.35%
EUV 0.35%
Fund size
CQTM $15M
EUV $260M
Holdings
CQTM 20
EUV 40
Avg volume (30D)
CQTM 21.3K sh
EUV 913K sh, better
NAV per share
CQTM $17.66
EUV $20.42
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CQTM: Cost 88, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 52, Durability 55. EUV: Cost 88, Risk 58, Mission not scored, Tradability 86, Holdings 82, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for CQTM, EUV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCQTMEUV
Cost30% weightA88A88
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC46B58Higher
Tradability15% weightC46A86Higher
Holdings10% weightC52A82Higher
Durability5% weightB55B69Higher

Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CQTM and EUV are both graded against the same 8 Quantum Computing & Photonics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 8 ›

EUV ranks 1st and CQTM 3rd of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.

  1. Rank 1AEUVCorgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AWQTMWisdomTree Quantum Computing FundScore 74
  3. Rank 3BCQTMCorgi Quantum Computing ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 4CLAZRTema Photonics & Optical ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CQTMBCorgi Quantum Computing ETF

EUVACorgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

In short

CQTM An active take on the quantum race that plays both sides: the companies building the machines and the ones building security meant to survive them. Fee is 0.35% a year, under the typical global thematic fund.

EUV No data

Stated mandate

CQTM The Fund's stated aim is to increase the value of shareholders' investments.

EUV No data

Why people hold it

  • CQTM 0.35% a year, comfortably below the median fee for the global thematic funds we grade.
  • The 80% mandate stretches past hardware: quantum-enabled technologies and post-quantum security are in scope, so defense against quantum counts alongside the build-out.
  • Actively managed and global in reach (US and international names), so the manager can rotate as the field moves instead of waiting on an index committee.
  • Lands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group in our grading, with no structural red flags on the wrapper (a standard 1940 Act fund).

EUV No data

Worth knowing

  • CQTM Launched in 2026, so the track record is short, and volatility has screened high even by single-theme standards. Our read on its risk rests on limited history.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume, which tends to mean wider gaps between the buy and sell price than on household-name ETFs.
  • The mandate targets capital appreciation and the fund has not been paying regular distributions, so this is a price-return holding.

EUV No data

Full CQTM profile⁠

Full EUV profile⁠

CQTM vs EUV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CQTM vs EUV Cost

Same expense ratio

$7,126

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CQTM 0.35%

    $7,126

  • EUV 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CQTM 0.35%
  • EUV 0.35%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CQTM $7,126EUV $7,126

Year by year

YearCQTMEUV
10$634$634
20$2,454$2,454
30$7,126$7,126

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%CQTM
  • 0.35%EUV
  • Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
  • Median 0.54%

CQTM cheapest of 8 funds

EUV cheapest of 8 funds

CQTM vs EUV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CQTM None
EUV None

Distribution history

CQTMAll CQTM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EUVAll EUV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CQTM vs EUV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CQTM 4.26EUV −1.39

CQTM and EUV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CQTMBvsWQTMA

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EUVAvsWQTMA

    Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF · WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQTMBvsLAZRC

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · Tema Photonics & Optical ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EUVAvsLAZRC

    Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF · Tema Photonics & Optical ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQTMBvsLYTEC

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EUVAvsLYTEC

    Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.