CQTM ranks 3rd and LAZR 4th of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.
CQTM vs LAZR
CQTM −0.40pt a year
0.35%0.75%
LAZR 8.7×the volume
21.3K186K
CQTM vs LAZR Performance
−23.5%−9.0%
- CQTM 0.35%, better
- LAZR 0.75%
- CQTM $15M
- LAZR $203M
- CQTM 20
- LAZR 25
- CQTM 21.3K sh
- LAZR 186K sh, better
- CQTM $17.66
- LAZR $34.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CQTM | LAZR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F22 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | C51Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | B55Higher |
| Durability | B55 | B65Higher |
Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
Same Category. CQTM and LAZR are both graded against the same 8 Quantum Computing & Photonics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CQTMB
LAZRC
In short
CQTM An active take on the quantum race that plays both sides: the companies building the machines and the ones building security meant to survive them. Fee is 0.35% a year, under the typical global thematic fund.
Stated mandate
CQTM The Fund's stated aim is to increase the value of shareholders' investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CQTM vs LAZR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CQTM vs LAZR Cost
Overpaying LAZR vs CQTM
$7,356
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CQTM 0.35%
$7,126
LAZR 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CQTM | LAZR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $1,336 | $702 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $5,078 | $2,624 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $14,482 | $7,356 |
- 0.35%CQTM, cheaper
- 0.75%LAZR
- Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
- Median 0.54%
CQTM cheapest of 8 funds
LAZR 7th cheapest of 8 funds
CQTM vs LAZR Dividends
- CQTM None
- LAZR None
Distribution history
CQTM vs LAZR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- CQTM 4.26LAZR 7.78
CQTM and LAZR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


