Skip to content

CQTM vs WQTM

Corgi Quantum Computing ETF

CQTMBCboe

WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

WQTMACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CQTM −0.10pt a year

CQTM0.35%WQTM0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

WQTM 10.0×the volume

CQTM21.3KWQTM214K

CQTM vs WQTM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−23.5%CQTM−16.2%WQTM

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CQTM −23.5%. WQTM −16.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%20%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CQTM 0.35%, better
WQTM 0.45%
Fund size
CQTM $15M
WQTM $291M
1Y total return
CQTM No data
WQTM −13.1%
Holdings
CQTM 20
WQTM 57
Avg volume (30D)
CQTM 21.3K sh
WQTM 214K sh, better
NAV per share
CQTM $17.66
WQTM $26.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CQTM: Cost 88, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 52, Durability 55. WQTM: Cost 72, Risk 75, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 90.
Pillar letters and Scores for CQTM, WQTM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCQTMWQTM
Cost30% weightA88HigherA72
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC46A75Higher
Tradability15% weightC46B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC52A89Higher
Durability5% weightB55A90Higher

Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CQTM and WQTM are both graded against the same 8 Quantum Computing & Photonics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 8 ›

WQTM ranks 2nd and CQTM 3rd of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.

  1. Rank 1AEUVCorgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AWQTMWisdomTree Quantum Computing FundScore 74
  3. Rank 3BCQTMCorgi Quantum Computing ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 4CLAZRTema Photonics & Optical ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CQTMBCorgi Quantum Computing ETF

WQTMAWisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

In short

CQTM An active take on the quantum race that plays both sides: the companies building the machines and the ones building security meant to survive them. Fee is 0.35% a year, under the typical global thematic fund.

WQTM Plenty of quantum ETFs treat a chip giant and a qubit startup as near-equals. WQTM, built with quantum software firm Classiq, scores how central quantum actually is to each company and pushes weight toward the pure plays.

Stated mandate

CQTM The Fund's stated aim is to increase the value of shareholders' investments.

WQTM The Fund passively tracks the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index.

Why people hold it

  • CQTM 0.35% a year, comfortably below the median fee for the global thematic funds we grade.
  • The 80% mandate stretches past hardware: quantum-enabled technologies and post-quantum security are in scope, so defense against quantum counts alongside the build-out.
  • Actively managed and global in reach (US and international names), so the manager can rotate as the field moves instead of waiting on an index committee.
  • Lands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group in our grading, with no structural red flags on the wrapper (a standard 1940 Act fund).
  • WQTM Every eligible company gets a relevancy score plus a 'pure' or 'diversified' tag, and those two judgments set its weight. Adjacency gets less; quantum-first gets more.wisdomtree.comwisdomtree.com 2
  • The index was co-developed with Classiq, a quantum software firm, and rebalances quarterly, so a fast-moving list of newly public names gets revisited on a set schedule.wisdomtree.com
  • Global reach, roughly 50 stocks, spanning quantum hardware, software, services, cryptography and the enabling tech underneath.thequantuminsider.com
  • Rules-based and passive rather than a manager's stock picks, and it sits in the top quartile of its quantum and photonics peer group on our review.

Worth knowing

  • CQTM Launched in 2026, so the track record is short, and volatility has screened high even by single-theme standards. Our read on its risk rests on limited history.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume, which tends to mean wider gaps between the buy and sell price than on household-name ETFs.
  • The mandate targets capital appreciation and the fund has not been paying regular distributions, so this is a price-return holding.
  • WQTM At 0.45%, it prices above the 0.35% median for its cohort, and peers like CQTM and QTUP list less. You pay up for the relevancy-weighted build.
  • Launched in October 2025, so there is little history to judge, and the portfolio is non-diversified: about 50 names inside one young, headline-driven theme.wisdomtree.com
  • Income policy is annual at most, distributing taxable income and capital gains once a year. This is a theme holding, not a cash-flow one.

Full CQTM profile⁠

Full WQTM profile⁠

CQTM vs WQTM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CQTM vs WQTM Cost

Overpaying WQTM vs CQTM

$1,915

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CQTM 0.35%

    $7,126

  • WQTM 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CQTM 0.35%
  • WQTM 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530WQTM $9,041CQTM $7,126

Year by year

YearCQTMWQTMOverpaying
10$634$812$178
20$2,454$3,128$674
30$7,126$9,041$1,915

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%CQTM, cheaper
  • 0.45%WQTM
  • Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
  • Median 0.54%

CQTM cheapest of 8 funds

WQTM 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

CQTM vs WQTM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CQTM None
WQTM None

Distribution history

CQTMAll CQTM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

WQTMAll WQTM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CQTM vs WQTM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CQTM No dataWQTM 50.2%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CQTM No dataWQTM −0.13since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CQTM No dataWQTM −36.3%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CQTM 4.26WQTM 2.92

CQTM and WQTM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CQTMBvsEUVA

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WQTMAvsEUVA

    WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund · Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQTMBvsLAZRC

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · Tema Photonics & Optical ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WQTMAvsLAZRC

    WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund · Tema Photonics & Optical ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQTMBvsLYTEC

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WQTMAvsLYTEC

    WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.