WQTM ranks 2nd and CQTM 3rd of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.
CQTM vs WQTM
CQTM −0.10pt a year
0.35%0.45%
WQTM 10.0×the volume
21.3K214K
CQTM vs WQTM Performance
−23.5%−16.2%
- CQTM 0.35%, better
- WQTM 0.45%
- CQTM $15M
- WQTM $291M
- CQTM
- WQTM −13.1%
- CQTM 20
- WQTM 57
- CQTM 21.3K sh
- WQTM 214K sh, better
- CQTM $17.66
- WQTM $26.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CQTM | WQTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A72 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | A89Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A90Higher |
Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
Same Category. CQTM and WQTM are both graded against the same 8 Quantum Computing & Photonics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CQTMB
WQTMA
In short
CQTM An active take on the quantum race that plays both sides: the companies building the machines and the ones building security meant to survive them. Fee is 0.35% a year, under the typical global thematic fund.
WQTM Plenty of quantum ETFs treat a chip giant and a qubit startup as near-equals. WQTM, built with quantum software firm Classiq, scores how central quantum actually is to each company and pushes weight toward the pure plays.
Stated mandate
CQTM The Fund's stated aim is to increase the value of shareholders' investments.
WQTM The Fund passively tracks the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CQTM vs WQTM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CQTM vs WQTM Cost
Overpaying WQTM vs CQTM
$1,915
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CQTM 0.35%
$7,126
WQTM 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CQTM | WQTM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $812 | $178 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $3,128 | $674 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $9,041 | $1,915 |
- 0.35%CQTM, cheaper
- 0.45%WQTM
- Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
- Median 0.54%
CQTM cheapest of 8 funds
WQTM 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
CQTM vs WQTM Dividends
- CQTM None
- WQTM None
Distribution history
CQTM vs WQTM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CQTM WQTM 50.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CQTM WQTM −0.13
- Worst fall
- CQTM WQTM −36.3%
- Market sensitivity
- CQTM 4.26WQTM 2.92
CQTM and WQTM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

