IGF ranks 2nd and CSIO 17th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
CSIO vs IGF
IGF −0.28pt a year
0.65%0.37%
IGF 65.0×the volume
13.4K874K
CSIO vs IGF Performance
+16.4%+8.8%
- CSIO 0.65%
- IGF 0.37%, better
- CSIO $52M
- IGF $10.9B
- CSIO
- IGF +11.2%
- CSIO
- IGF 2.93%
- CSIO 30
- IGF 89
- CSIO 13.4K sh
- IGF 874K sh, better
- CSIO $28.61
- IGF $65.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSIO | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | A93Higher | A72 |
| Tradability | C46 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | A72Higher |
| Durability | D26 | A92Higher |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. CSIO and IGF are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSIOC
IGFA
In short
CSIO Global infrastructure without the index. Cohen & Steers runs CSIO as a high-conviction, actively managed book of infrastructure stocks, chosen by fundamental company analysis rather than benchmark weight.
IGF About 80 developed-market infrastructure companies in one ticker, tracked against the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, for 0.37% a year (well under the category norm).
Stated mandate
CSIO The Fund seeks total return. It pursues this objective primarily through a high-conviction portfolio of global common stocks and other equity securities issued by infrastructure companies, using active management and fundamental company analysis.
IGF The Fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities focused on the infrastructure industry.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSIO vs IGF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSIO vs IGF Cost
Overpaying CSIO vs IGF
$5,204
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSIO 0.65%
$12,717
IGF 0.37%
$7,513
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSIO | IGF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $670 | $493 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,590 | $1,850 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $7,513 | $5,204 |
- 0.65%CSIO
- 0.37%IGF, cheaper
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IGF 3rd cheapest of 33 funds
CSIO 22nd cheapest of 33 funds
CSIO vs IGF Dividends
- CSIO
- IGF 2.93%
- CSIO
- IGF $1.93
- CSIO $0.10
- IGF $0.93
- CSIO Sep 29, 2026
- IGF Jun 15, 2026
- CSIO Sep 30, 2026
- IGF Jun 18, 2026
- CSIO Quarterly
- IGF Twice a year
Distribution history
CSIO vs IGF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSIO IGF 12.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSIO IGF 1.18
- Worst fall
- CSIO IGF −20.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CSIO 0.17IGF 0.62
CSIO and IGF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



